Overall, the flavor was of wood and coffee. Started out with a little pepper through the nose, and then shifted to the coffee about mid way. Medium bodied.
Rating - B
Printable View
Overall, the flavor was of wood and coffee. Started out with a little pepper through the nose, and then shifted to the coffee about mid way. Medium bodied.
Rating - B
:smiley36:
Wasn't much else to say. It wasn't the most complex cigar I've had, nor was it outstanding. It was good, a solid B cigar. I wouldn't invest in a box. I did not like this cigar as much as the Angeles. Some people have that taste for coffee. I prefer a more "tobacco" flavor.
you found a difference between the two sizes? I haven't had both, so i cannot compare them but how does the taste differ if its the same blend?
Good question. I have smoked at least a couple of boxes of each of these sizes and they are identical in flavor. Granted, each has slightly different draw/burn characteristics (none of which are bad). I have never sensed coffee in any Tatuaje. Pretty much smooth tobacco with a nice spice. I cannot say that I have really picked up on coffee in any stick other than a Java:smiley11: . Just my opinion. We all have different taste buds- so each to his own....
Just because cigars carry the same name, different sizes will not all taste the same. The blends are manipulated for each size. A group of tasters will taste blends for a particular size and determine what production will be.
... plus, with larger ring gauges, you're gonna get more filler tobacco, giving it a different profile. With smaller ring guages, your filler to wrapper ratio changes a great deal. If you enjoy a nice cameroon wrapper, you will get more of the flavor from the wrapper in the smaller ring gauges. If any of that makes any sense. This is from my experience and is my opinion.
Right......here is a little more info about that......
http://www.aficionadocigar.com/cigar...nstruction.htm