^^ :smiley37:Im a big fan of those! ^^
Printable View
^^ :smiley37:Im a big fan of those! ^^
Not sure. But it was a decent little smoke. A pre-cut cigarillo, candella wrapper, very mild, gifted to me by a buddy at work today, you know the guy, says his "uncle" rolls them for him, but he sure seems to have lots of uncles... It came from an unmarked tin he had in his pocket. I want to say I've had these before, but they came in a shiney 3-pack ziplock bag from a roadside gas station, can't remember the brand though. Looks like this:
ERDM Choix Supreme
Padron 3000, padron londres, padron 26~35 natty
Dayum Will. Save some Paddys for the rest of us. ;-)Quote:
Originally Posted by badwhale
I've been smoking lots of Padron londres maduros lately.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I was suckered in with all these Padrons seeing fire so I found it fit to sacrafice an aged 1926 serie #2 maddy.:smiley15:
Trying this Nica Rustica that didn't qualify for the FFL. Really good looking cigar, not smoking too bad so far.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Just picked up a few more of those. Very good stickQuote:
Originally Posted by kingbeefy
Oliva G serie box press Churchill with Guinness stout
Attachment 3809
Padron 1964 Anniversary Series Box Pressed Maduro Torpedo
WOW!
Thoroughly enjoying this smoke, along with Fort Collins Brewery Chocolate Stout. Thanks badwhale and buzz for recommending this one! Gonna ask Santa for a box, and try to be a good boy until Christmas...
Duque Churchill... Not horrible, albeit not great either. Let's just say it was well worth the buck I paid for it, and was not the pure dog rocket I expected it to be. I definitely plan on smoking something much better tonight after a ribeye supper!
I rest my case.Quote:
Originally Posted by SPEEDRACER
I'm having a Padron '26 Maduro ~ #35
http://tapatalk.imageshack.com/v2/14...faacd6791f.jpg
Sitting out back with the legendary Beefy
Enjoying some 858SG
http://www.cigarsmokers.com/attachme...6&d=1400121159
Padron's of any kind are good but the series 1926 are one tasty cigar. I'm planning on sharing a No. 35 with a couple friends tomorrow evening!Quote:
Originally Posted by SPEEDRACER
Sat:
My Father Le Bijou 1922
Sun:
AF Double Chateau Fuente
The AF was from a 10 sampler Will hooked me up with. This is the last of the two Double Fuente's and all I can say is....YUM! Like the Padron's, I haven't met a Arturo Fuente I didn't like.
Today, a Sancho Panza x-tra fuerte & a Tatuaje classic regios
What a tasty stick.
http://tapatalk.imageshack.com/v2/14...0b1ccec273.jpg
Headed out to the porch with an Undercrown Robusto and a Negra Modelo. Will report back later...Attachment 3823
Why the hell are my attachments always sideways?! :mad:
Fuente WOA
My Father No. 4 Lanceros. Will definitely be getting more of these.
Hmm...undecided. Sure wish it was a smaller RG.
http://tapatalk.imageshack.com/v2/14...8af9b1b833.jpg
Victor Sinclair Series 55 Corojo Cigarillo. My favorite "short smoke".
Something happened, and now I can't upload pics anymore...
Had a Padron Londres maduro and now I'm on to a Johnny O short. I've had plenty of plugged Johnny O's, but these shorts have been fantastic.
xikar hc series habano 2 box press robusto with founders porter. Pretty decent
Attachment 3827
How was that Nica Rustica, Dan? Got one in the humidor. Thinking about firing it up tomorrow. Or maybe tonight...
The nica is a go to stick for me. It's medium to full strength and has awesome flavor with decent spice. Not a complex cigar but it's consistent. Toast one up manQuote:
Originally Posted by SPEEDRACER
Nica Rustica by Drew Estate
Dan, you nailed it. I like it a lot.
Awesome man glad you enjoyed it.Quote:
Originally Posted by SPEEDRACER
PDR 1878 capa Maduro torpedo with DFH 90 minute IPA.
Attachment 3829
Attachment 3830
That thing looks hinkey to me. Did it taste alright?Quote:
Originally Posted by DanB6177
Yeah it was from a 10 box variety. Real thin so it's not complexQuote:
Originally Posted by badwhale
Like bigger gauges but still was great and had the classic cohiba twang.
Not to be a drag but, Cohiba bands have three rows of dots above the name. Yours shows only two.Quote:
Originally Posted by DanB6177
http://www.cigaraficionado.com/count.../view/id/15403
http://havanajournal.com/cigars/cohibas
Its a different band altogether. Its so small that the word cohiba gos around the entire stick. I guess it would be classified a cigarello. But the taste was for sure the same as cohiba. Pretty much the same as the esplendidos. The fishy thing about em is I cannot locate them online. They were called selectos. So they could be fakeys which would be fine cause the taste is definitely there. I had an esplendido churchill last week and this was same without the complexityQuote:
Originally Posted by CptnBlues63
edit: Then again perhaps the esplendidos where fake too, they were free and the source wasnt someone Id call 100% honest lol. I know that they had 2 rows above the band as well but the guy had them for awhile so could have been older when they made them with 2 rows. I have a siglo 4 and a lancero that are for sure real. Those do have 3 rows above the name and the guy lives in cuba so makes it easier lol. Ill have to smoke one of them to compare.
But honestly the esplendido and the mini where both very very good when smoked.
And, of course, cigars acquired under such circumstances would not make good candidates for trades / passes etc. :smiley2:Quote:
Originally Posted by DanB6177
I would say not. However I will trade you 3 fake cigars and eddie lacy for 1 shark:highly_amused:Quote:
Originally Posted by ashauler
Oh, boy... That sure has bad written all over it. Please don't be trading that or passing them out. That would cause an uproar.Quote:
Originally Posted by DanB6177
I'm not sure what Cohiba 'twang' you're speaking about, but I sure am awfully suspicious if you taste legit Cohiba with that cigar.