FPDoc77 Ban?

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

11-29-2005, 06:06 PM
Island Epicurean

Man CC, stop being so offended. I am partially on your side here.... I actually voted for a 30 day ban.
11-29-2005, 06:07 PM
FPDoc77

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoventryCat86

So you're just going to sit there wallowing in your own arrogance, refusing to admit you're wrong, not offering any kind of apology whatsoever and think that all will be forgotten?

I got news for ya asshole, it won't happen like that :smiley2:

CC I wont offer you an apology because you started this with me. I offered the first poster that corrected my spelling an apology. Dude just give this up, have a drink, smoke a cigar and RELAX. Ok I get it...you dont like me. I get that you think im a total turd. You know what I dont know you personally so I dont have any hatred towards you. How much energy have you expended on me?
11-29-2005, 06:11 PM
CoventryCat86

Quote:

Originally Posted by FPDoc77

CC I wont offer you an apology because you started this with me. I offered the first poster that corrected my spelling an apology. Dude just give this up, have a drink, smoke a cigar and RELAX. Ok I get it...you dont like me. I get that you think im a total turd. You know what I dont know you personally so I dont have any hatred towards you. How much energy have you expended on me?

OMG, you are indeed done here. Once again, you're lying. YOU "started" this with me and continued with a barrage of attacks and personal insults that were completely uncalled for.

Okay Sid and the rest of you who think's this guy is "okay," I'd like your opinions on him now....
11-29-2005, 06:15 PM
FPDoc77

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoventryCat86

OMG, you are indeed done here. Once again, you're lying. YOU "started" this with me and continued with a barrage of attacks and personal insults that were completely uncalled for.

Okay Sid and the rest of you who think's this guy is "okay," I'd like your opinions on him now....

How did I start this again? Go through the trinidad corojo post. You just laid into me...I hadnt done anything to you. I had not said one ill word to you at that point. I hadnt made one smart ass comment to you. As for you defending another member I already apologized to...dont you think basil, superman, etc did that well enough? And why cant men here fight their own battles?
11-29-2005, 06:20 PM
CoventryCat86

Quote:

Originally Posted by Island Epicurean

Man CC, stop being so offended. I am partially on your side here.... I actually voted for a 30 day ban.

For cryin' out loud, it's not a matter of being "offended" it's a matter of becoming completely disgusted with your laziness and sloppiness and refusal to type and spell correctly combined with your continued refusal to proofread your posts. THEN to make matters worse, you say:

Quote:

The post says swisher sweet.... Not shisher sweet........

:smiley29: :smiley29:

So if you want to tell me to stop being so DISGUSTED with you, my answer that that would be I will become less disgusted with you when you clean up your act with your sloppy posting. You clearly make NO EFFORT to do so and it doesn't make you look good......

To tell me to stop "being so offended" is once again a stupid statement on your part. Your contined stupidity disgusts me as well....
11-29-2005, 06:24 PM
CoventryCat86

Quote:

Originally Posted by FPDoc77

How did I start this again? Go through the trinidad corojo post. You just laid into me...I hadnt done anything to you. I had not said one ill word to you at that point. I hadnt made one smart ass comment to you. As for you defending another member I already apologized to...dont you think basil, superman, etc did that well enough? And why cant men here fight their own battles?

I did not "lay into" you, go back and read it again from the beginning.

Once again you are a liar and your ignorance and stubborness is only making it worse for you.
11-29-2005, 06:25 PM
Island Epicurean

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoventryCat86

For cryin' out loud, it's not a matter of being "offended" it's a matter of becoming completely disgusted with your laziness and sloppiness and refusal to type and spell correctly combined with your continued refusal to proofread your posts. THEN to make matters worse, you say:

:smiley29: :smiley29:

So if you want to tell me to stop being so DISGUSTED with you, my answer that that would be I will become less disgusted with you when you clean up your act with your sloppy posting. You clearly make NO EFFORT to do so and it doesn't make you look good......

To tell me to stop "being so offended" is once again a stupid statement on your part. Your contined stupidity disgusts me as well....

It Continued, NOT contined...... Contined is not a word.

You also dont need the 2 "that"'s in your 2nd last paragraph.
11-29-2005, 06:36 PM
CoventryCat86

Quote:

Originally Posted by Island Epicurean

It Continued, NOT contined...... Contined is not a word.

You also dont need the 2 "that"'s in your 2nd last paragraph.

LMAO!!

You should have said "It's" not "It" and you should have said "2nd to last" instead of "2nd last"

My God boy, if you insist on pointing out my mistakes, you really should smarten the fock up! :smiley36: and get your own house in order first.

You're making a complete ass out of yourself......
11-29-2005, 06:41 PM
Island Epicurean

Actually, when I said "It continued" I was refering to the continuation of my spelling mistakes. Ergo, the "it" I was refering to was my spelling problem. I was not quoting your mistake. To say "It Continued, not contined," is perfectly acceptable english. My spelling mistakes did continue, they did not contine since contine is not a proper english word.
11-29-2005, 06:43 PM
Island Epicurean

Also, 2nd last is acceptable in a formal situation...... It can be used in formal situations since it is actually the 2nd last paragraph. While it is not perfectly functional english, I doubt it would draw any serious criticism.
11-29-2005, 06:59 PM
Drake

Quote:

Originally Posted by Island Epicurean

Also, 2nd last is acceptable in a formal situation...... It can be used in formal situations since it is actually the 2nd last paragraph. While it is not perfectly functional english, I doubt it would draw any serious criticism.

but it did. deal with it. who fuggin cares? geez. let it go!
11-29-2005, 07:31 PM
CoventryCat86

Quote:

Originally Posted by Island Epicurean

Also, 2nd last is acceptable in a formal situation...... It can be used in formal situations since it is actually the 2nd last paragraph. While it is not perfectly functional english, I doubt it would draw any serious criticism.

Face it, you're wrong. :smiley36:

Proper English is actually "second to last" (you should SPELL out "second" and not abbreviate it as you did). It is FAR from "functional English" and would draw "serious criticsm" from any English treacher that you would put this in front of.

You remind me of fpdoc who when faced with the obvious fact that he's wrong just sits there and keeps making excuses. :smiley36:
11-29-2005, 07:33 PM
TheSilentChamber

Well it looks like a ban of some sort is winning. I'm not counting a few votes... (IE the person that this poll is about and a person that has 11 posts and hasnt really contributed anything to this forum that I'v seen).
11-29-2005, 07:34 PM
FlowerBasketExpress2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoventryCat86

Face it, you're wrong. :smiley36:

Proper English is actually "second to last" (you should SPELL out "second" and not abbreviate it as you did). It is FAR from "functional English" and would draw "serious criticsm" from any English treacher that you would put this in front of.

You remind me of fpdoc who when faced with the obvious fact that he's wrong just sits there and keeps making excuses. :smiley36:

And how to the smilies come into play in your own grammar. This I do not think has been discussed by scholars at much length.
11-29-2005, 07:39 PM
Island Epicurean

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoventryCat86

Face it, you're wrong. :smiley36:

Proper English is actually "second to last" (you should SPELL out "second" and not abbreviate it as you did). It is FAR from "functional English" and would draw "serious criticsm" from any English treacher that you would put this in front of.

You remind me of fpdoc who when faced with the obvious fact that he's wrong just sits there and keeps making excuses. :smiley36:

Might want to add another i to criticism........
11-29-2005, 07:40 PM
Island Epicurean

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoventryCat86

Face it, you're wrong. :smiley36:

Proper English is actually "second to last" (you should SPELL out "second" and not abbreviate it as you did). It is FAR from "functional English" and would draw "serious criticsm" from any English treacher that you would put this in front of.

You remind me of fpdoc who when faced with the obvious fact that he's wrong just sits there and keeps making excuses. :smiley36:

You might also want to remove the r from teacher.
11-29-2005, 07:49 PM
CoventryCat86

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlowerBasketExpress2005

And how to the smilies come into play in your own grammar. This I do not think has been discussed by scholars at much length.

You've lost me completely
11-29-2005, 07:59 PM
ggiese

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoventryCat86

You've lost me completely

That's flowerbasket for ya... :smiley29:
11-29-2005, 08:00 PM
CoventryCat86

Quote:

Originally Posted by ggiese

That's flowerbasket for ya... :smiley29:

It used to be "cuntbasket" didn't it?
11-29-2005, 08:08 PM
TheSilentChamber

I'm suprised Secret Santa hasnt voted yet...

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:07 PM.