Printable View
This is my very favorite cigar!! I'm glad you enjoyed it......:smiley20: As far as getting another one........from me the chance is zero as that was my last one.
I flipped a coin to see if you or KC got it........you won. Now I'm off to look for more, but I fear I will have no luck.....they are indeed difficult to obtain. I have searched a couple of times and, total, I have only had in my possession 15 of these cigars.
Awesome reviews KC and DW. I'm really learning a lot from you guys. Keep it up:smiley20:
Gotta hate Jamie for hooking us up with awesome cigars that are not obtainable :smiley7:
The MB-1 is an outstanding cigar, judging by the single example I have had the pleasure of setting on fire!
Great review(s), Keep 'em coming guys:smiley20:
I have something that I really need to get off my chest. You both are horrible, horrible people. I have spent countless hours over the past week tirelessly researching different makers and blends. I have been digging through pages of online samplers and deals trying to decided what to spend my money on. Then, I start going through this wealth of information, reading, checking the index, rereading, over and over. If it weren’t for your incredibly thorough and informative reviews, I may have made up my mind on exactly what to order already. I may have just settled on a few safety smokes that I am already familiar with, or maybe even blindly picked out a box of dog rockets. Thanks for all the awesome reviews guys, keep em coming! Maybe I’ll make up my mind one of these days.:smiley42:
Try 'em all!Quote:
Originally Posted by Eville
ChefChris sent a few missles my way a few days back so I thought I'd start with one that was new to me. Signature Collection instantly brought to mind Carlos Torano, however Nick Perdomo also has a Signature Collection.
The Figurado is of course made entirely by hand using select Cuban Criollo 1999 Nicaraguan shade-grown wrapper. It is a mild-medium bodied smoke with pronounced spiciness and woodsey flovors. Actually, at first I thought that Chris might have had it together with an Acid in his humi where it might have picked up some herbal or floral scents. But fortunately not, this cigar is perfect if you like them spicy. Around midway it builds in strength yet keeps refreshing aftertaste. Very complex with billowing clouds of rich, heady smoke and a very easy draw make it pleasant to smoke.
I enjoyed it with a glass of Jacob's Cabernet. For me many cigars just do not do well with a red wine. Only the sweeter ports for medium to full cigars. Anyway, this was a really good combo and I really liked this cigar. It burned perfectly with a uniform cone and white ash until the very end where it moved to one side. Not really a problem.
Nick Perdomo labeled these as "kick-ass mild cigars". He's right. :smiley20:
On a scale of 1-10 I rate this cigar 8.7.
LOL......I hope you don't think it gets any easier. :smiley2: If you haven't already, try the newbie sampler........that will make your head spin.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eville
Famous last words........as you tip over the edge of the slope. :smiley2:Quote:
Originally Posted by logan37
LOL. My humi is filled with only one of each stick(some I have two of). Each day I have a different one. So far there are three that I plan on buying boxes of.Quote:
Originally Posted by ashauler
Quote:
Originally Posted by ashauler
Oh, no, it was fine. The wrapper problem was very minor and near the end anyway. A very tasty smoke. I enjoyed it, especially at the beginning. What a great start.
Thanks for the kind words.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eville
Glad you enjoyed the Signature Series. I don't hear a lot of people smoking these, but I enjoy them every now and then and so does Sarah. You can get a box of CBid for cheap.
Wrapper: Ecuadorian sun-grown Sumatra
Binder: Connecticut Broadleaf
Filler: Honduran and Dominican
Thanks to Ashauler for scaring the crap out of me with this big Toro. The cigar comes well dressed in a cedar sleeve and a triple band in black and gold. When I pulled the stick out of its cello wrapper the aroma immediately drifted up as if to whisper to my nose that I was going to have my ass kicked. Yes, this cigar smells like a beating one looks forward to, a really strong classic tobacco smell. Read on, it turns out to be more gentle and civilized than it looked.
The wrapper was a dark-chocolate brown and very shiny and oily. Did I mention it smelled great? Construction was firm and solid and let’s light this thing already. The cut was made with no problem, toasting smelled nice, and away we went. Smoke volume was immediately admirable, and the flavor was milder than I was expecting at the start. The first asset the flavor profile showed me was nuttiness, followed by a glimpse of earthiness. (I am beginning to think Ashauler likes earthy, nutty cigars, no?)
The first third showed my poor lighting technique by starting out with a slightly uneven burn. The burn evened itself out pretty quickly, the burn line became very sharp indeed, and the taste of leather, oh, yes, my very favorite cigar taste of leather started to appear upon the palate. Coffee followed soon after. The ash was light gray and solid and fell off after about an inch.
In the second third the taste of black coffee was getting stronger, with nuts immediately behind; the leathery taste was relegated to the role of entertaining the palate in the lingering aftertaste. The final third showed more assertiveness from the leather (again) and perhaps a bit of a fade of the coffee, with all flavors getting stronger. I thought I detected a bit of black cherry (of all things) toward the end of each puff in the final third, which was a pleasant surprise. This was a very long-lasting smoke, about an hour and a half.
This is a solid, civilized, lovely cigar that looks brutal and strong; it starts gentle, making one feels as if this stick is all bluster and no balls; but the strength, complexity, and flavor build until the end, which is a crescendo of music for the tongue’s ear, as it were.
Score: 94. I could not find anything not to love about this stick. Ashauler, I thank you very warmly for this very nice evening.
Great review KC. Now I've got to find some these because of you, the very person who warned us about the slippery slope. :smiley22:
Very, very nice review. One of the best, if not the best, of the NC HdM's imho. Glad you enjoyed it.
Thanks Chris. This is now one of my favorites. I like Habano's anyway but this was one of the most pleasurable I have smoked in a while. I fired this one up as soon as I got home from the office. I should have waited until after dinner as it was very robust and full-bodied.
Ernesto Carrillo of La Gloria Cubana owns this lesser known line of cigars which are considered stronger and even fuller-flavored than the La Glorias. Wrapped in a reddish-brown Colorado wrapper that is slightly veiny it is well packed with an easy draw. It toasted well and immediately produced a cloud of rich, mellow smoke on the first draw.
The next 40 minutes were (for me) what smoking cigars is all about. First, I lit up with an open mind about what to expect from a new cigar. The entire process of smelling the wrapper, cutting, pre-light draw, toasting and the first draw all indicated that this would be a good cigar. But, you know many do not improve much beyond the first few puffs before they either run (we're talking about Habanos), are packed unevenly or stack up some bitterness or harshness that eventually ruins the experience. The El Rico burned evenly, very nice light grey, sturdy ash. Habano's tend to have a mottled or spotted ash that curls with an off-center cone.
The rich, earthy flavors never wavered, keeping a smooth, creamy pace with a little woodiness, hints of leather and thick, humid, forest scents. Next time, I will wait until after dinner and have one with a couple fingers of Patron on ice. Ideally, I like to shoot a small shot of aged Tequila first, no salt or lime, and swish it for a few seconds. It's like a pre-smoke mouth wash if that makes sense.
Thanks again Chris. :smiley20:
On a scale of 1-10 I rate this cigar 8.9.
Awesome, I love this cigar and I know Woxof does, too. I'm glad I could turn you on to it. It is wonderful.
Very nice review, DW. That cigar sounds as if it's right up my alley; I'll have to try one.
Thanks DW, sounds like a great cigar. I'm going to look into this one.
OK, gents, going on a fishing trip all this week; I have two more sticks from Ashauler to review when I get back. Wish me luck!
have fun and good luck
I hope your taking some "fishgars"? One of those important items (fishing gear, bait, beer and cigars). Anything else like cell phone, extra change of clothes, boom box can be left at home. You won't need them. :smiley2:Quote:
Originally Posted by King Catfish
Thanks again Chris for the REO. More Kudos to Rocky Patel for a joint effort with EO Brands to blend a really good cigar.
This is a medium/full-bodied box pressed cigar with a five year old Sumatra seed wrapper grown in Costa Rica. It is a blend of select Nicaraguan and Honduran long fillers. It has some impressive complex flavors, burns impeccably and has a really nice finish.
It toasted with hints of "toast", lit well and burned evenly. It was consistant throughout and never got bitter or harsh. Certainly a good cigar yet I won't ramble on because it falls in the quagmire of literally hundreds of good cigars and does not have a distinguishing characteristic that set it apart.
I'm sure this is a good seller because it is a good value for the price. I have not tried the other three vitolas by REO.
On a scale of 1-10 I rate this cigar 8.
I like these, along with the very similiar Vibe Corojo, they have absolutely Beautiful wrappers on them. Thay can be had for very decent prices, and make great fish/yardgars.
Last evening I enjoyed this Don Tomas Robusto by General Cigars that Chris bestowed upon me. A few years ago I would shy away from Don Tomas as I had some less than pleasant cigars from them. I think construction and quality were to blame because they did not burn evenly and sometimes became bitter toward the end. Now, however things have changed for the better, especially the Sun Grown line.
The "Sun Grown" consists of aged Brazilian, Mexican and Honduran tobaccos grown in Honduras, blended and wrapped in a Honduran Jamastran natural leaf. Rich and spicy flavors, this medium to full-bodied puro has notes of cedar and wood, is well balanced with a good finish. I especially liked the beautiful wrapper with a slightly oily sheen and small veins, tightly and smoothly wrapped. The smoking experience was dead on with a pleasant toast, easy draw, plenty smoke, even burn and firm salt/pepper ash. The flavors were consistantly medium-bodied yet mellow and smooth. A very good value cigar. :smiley20:
On a scale of 1-10 I rate this cigar 8.5.
Oh, of course. Smoked a few cheapies and a nice stick or two. And did well with the fishes as well. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by DeeDubya
I recently picked up a box of Savinelli's at a good price. They turned out to be a nice little surprise package. They're around $5 but I got them for $3.40. They are made by Oliva so "Duh" I wasn't really taking a big chance on getting some duds.
These are very limited edition Nicaraguan full-bodied, spicy, well balanced, savory, delicious cigars. The wrapper is Ecuadorian, dark, oily, medium veins. The Nicaraguan filler is long-aged vintage tobacco with a Nicaraguan binder.
It toasted well and surrendered hints of spiciness. The draw was near perfect producing creamy clouds of rich, earthy smoke. One can immediately appreciate the aged fillers which remain consistantly smooth and complex for the entire length. I actually considered taking a dinner break and smoking another last evening. It was that good. I had a Shiner Hefeweizen with this one. A Guiness would be a good choice as well.
I'm thinking the Savinelli's were a joint venture with Famous as the box had been opened and re-wrapped with a note indicating that it had been inspected for quality control. I'll be ordering another box to stash in the tupperdore for a little additional aging.
On a scale of 1-10 I rate this cigar 9.2. :smiley20:
Nice review as always. Oliva doesn't seem to miss on many smokes.
Where in the hell are you two???? I'm jonsing for some more quality reviews. :smiley7: Get your asses back on the job. :smiley41:
Please. :smiley9::smiley31:
Has anyone seen KingCatfish? His profile doesn't have him logged in since September 23rd.
DeeDubya?
[QUOTE=ashauler;117396]Where in the hell are you two???? I'm jonsing for some more quality reviews. :smiley7: Get your asses back on the job. :smiley41:
Yeah, I think I'll email KC and shake him loose. Just reading between the lines, I think maybe a little spousal pressure in play there.
I'll smoke 7 cigars today and try to make up for lost time and post some reviews.
Spousal pressure is definitely a drag, right up there with purchasing bans. :smiley5:Quote:
Originally Posted by DeeDubya
7 stogies + 1 bottle of Tequila = Interesting Reviews :smiley20:
Well yes, when I said spousal pressure, that could be budgeting, health issues, too much self-indulgence, I don't know. Like I said, just reading between the lines, I might have missed the mark so I don't want to jump to dilusions. http://smilies.vidahost.com/contrib/anym/hanged.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by ashauler
On a whim I decided to try a Double Chateau last evening. Thinking that the cedar sleeve was the only real difference between it and the other Grand Reserva's, I didn't expect any surprises.
After removing the sleeve, and sniffing the length of the barrel I could really appreciate the spicey Spanish cedar influence. I have always dismissed cedar sleeves as more of a novel artsy display like any other fancy band. This time around I'm convinced that it really does impart some special flavors. I attribute this to aging. I've had this stick in the humi for some time, probably effectively doubling the time from rolling till it was smoked.
This is a lighter Connecticut shade wrapper that appears to be dry yet silky with practically no oiliness, small veins throughout, no soft spots and a firm solid roll head to toe.
Toasting produced some of the cedar and a goodly amount of bluish, thick smoke. After a few puffs of a cool blend of tobacco, cedar and toast I got a very slight metallic aftertaste. I write this off to my palate as it can be caused by some othe influence like medication (not that I am medicated), food or most likely the glass of cabernet I had with dinner. My son was on the phone waiting for me to light up (he's in Albuquerque and we often smoke a stog while we share our thoughts) so I didn't get to do my Tequila shot and properly cleanse the palate.
About midway I detected some grassy flavors but not so much to be concerned. Green grass flavors normally indicate a young (short aged) cigar and would also add some bitterness but this is not the case. It burned flawlessly with a near perfect white ash for the entire length. The strength and flavors did stack a little toward the end, but it is a fairly large vitola. I really enjoyed this cigar and intend to get a box and start to age them in the cooler for at least a year.
While not up there with the Hemingways, OpusX, Masterpiece, it is a great value at around only $4.50/stick. Just age them a little more and they are near perfect.
On a scale of 1-10 I rate this cigar 9.
Nice review DW. I guess I will wait to smoke this one. Do you know how long you had the stick in your humi? Over a year? 2+?
I know I've had it at least a year. But I don't know when it was rolled. The problem with singles is just that... you don't know the production date. Boxes are always marked, so if you buy some singles just look at the box and make note of the date. Some are aged in the box but then I've bought a number of boxes that are only a month or two old.Quote:
Originally Posted by logan37
Thanks DW. I wont be able to find out when the box was packed because the shop I bought it at just refills the boxes/cases that are already on the shelves usually.
That's a very common practice, both my regular stores do the same thing.Quote:
Originally Posted by logan37
Yep, that pretty much does it. I think Rob here at HCH tries to keep them in the original box, at least the high end sticks.Quote:
Originally Posted by logan37
Another cedar-sleeved cigar.
KC did an "informal" review on this cigar some time back. I found one hibernating in my humi that I decided to try and compare to what he found. Now, given that he bought a bundle and immediately smoked them and this one has aged at least another 6 months might make a difference. I'm not sure if this is actually one that he had sent to me from the same bundle but I know I have had it at least that long.
I have no problem with the Shaggy-Foot. I toast and light them as any other stick. It would seem that they would flare up and start to burn crazy with all the loose filler sticking out but not so. They might even light better. I suspect it is more old-world novelty than function.
They are considered to be a premium handmade blend even at the low price of around $3-5 when bought on sale. There are so many factors that determine a cigar's price but of course the old faithful "supply-and-demand" theory is probably in play here with this line. If it catches on and attracts some attention, look out, prices are going up. It's a good cigar, it just needs a few more fans.
It is composed of a blend of heavy Nicaraguan long-fillers with a rich Ligero core and wrapped in a lustrous Honduran Corojo. Contrary to KC's "bundle" they are supposedly box aged for 6 months prior to distribution. This may be traditional oak box aging from which they are removed and re-packed to sell. It certainly had some oak wood flavor and really nice spicey finish. It had an unattractive salt-pepper ash but burned evenly and firmly. Overall it smoked very smoothly, producing thick creamy clouds of smoke with little effort. I enjoy a smoke just a little more when I don't have to coax it to burn properly.
I would consider this stick to be another "good value" at this time. KC gave this cigar an 82/100. I'm going raise the pot a little and attribute it to the extra aging.
On a scale of 1-10 I rate this cigar 8.5.
Yet another fabulous review. I have two questions.Quote:
Originally Posted by DeeDubya
One: Do you think the shaggy foots seen now in the more boutique brands more of a novelty, and what function could they possibly serve?
Two: Care to perhaps go a bit more in depth of the way you light a cigar? I'm still a newb. I just torch the fucking thing until I'm sure the end is entirely lit, and I know I'm doing it wrong, but all searching the forums only brings up vague descriptions. I sometimes use a torch, but most often, use matches, lighting the cigar (of course) after the sulfur burns off (but could be 5-10 matches). Thanks.
Good questions but I'm afraid I will fail the first. I have not found a solid answer for why "Shaggy-foot" other than "Old World Tradition". I suspect it might go back as far as the first cigars. Now, yes I think it is just a novelty.Quote:
Originally Posted by mrtr33
Properly lighting a cigar is probably as diverse as smoking one; But, I have some solid "Must do" and "Must not do" rules.
Lighting media - Get away from sulfer matches. They are only better than rubbing two sticks together. Basically, any match or torch that can introduce any contaminates to your cigar can and will taint the taste. It is almost impossible to avoid contaminates, mainly soot, so that's why it is so important to:
Toast - Use a blue flame torch or cedar spill to get the best results. Hold your cigar in one hand (not your mouth) and the torch or spill in the other. Keep the foot just above the tip of the flame where it is the hottest and most contaminates have been consumed. Slowly roll the cigar above the flame until you see an ember start to glow. Do not allow the flame to light the wrapper, just the very end of the foot. When it starts to glow, pull the flame away and blow on the foot, watching for a full ember. If you see some dark spots or it looks uneven, toast a little more and blow again. This really takes much less time than you might think and will vary with each vitola. A robusto would take longer to light than a corona. As soon as you have a full ember, puff away. Because you already have a full ember you won't have to draw very hard, it is already well lit. I promise, it will be become a natural and you will appreciate the result over time.
The Results - Because you have not drawn any contaminates into the cigar it will be in it's purest state. Let's take an extreme case with a sulfer match. Strike the match and immediately start to light your cigar. The burned sulfer is pulled completely through the entire length of the cold tobacco filler. As it does it condenses on the cooler tobacco and remains there. You have ruined an otherwise good cigar and it will not change as you smoke it. Oh, you will probably not notice it after a few minutes because you are now used to the sulfer taste. I am so picky that I can even taste the soot from a soft flame lighter if it is allowed to blacken the foot of a cigar. Zippos? Don't even ask. This is a cigar not a cigarette. You are in a different league.
Spills - The correct name for a cedar splint or stick or even the rolled up cedar sleeve you just removed from you cigar is a "Spill". Use one to toast your cigar. It is not as easy as using a torch because they sometime burn faster than the time it takes to toast. I like cedar spills but they also produce a lot of soot and sometimes pop and shoot little embers which can also be a challenge. Some justify the extra effort with an improved taste.
I hope this will help. I don't claim to be an expert by any stretch of the imagination, but I have picked up some helpful hints along the way. Quite a long way I might add.