I was in Boston yesturday and stumbled across a B&M.
I came across this cigar. I have never seen nor heard of before.
I bought one just to check it out. I'll give it a week to rest and then I'll review it.
Orsac 1962 - Learn something new every day.
Printable View
I was in Boston yesturday and stumbled across a B&M.
I came across this cigar. I have never seen nor heard of before.
I bought one just to check it out. I'll give it a week to rest and then I'll review it.
Orsac 1962 - Learn something new every day.
That name rung a bell with me only because there was a deal on Monster for them yesterday.
Will
I think the name is diputs - it should be 2691.
You lost me brother ?Quote:
Originally Posted by craig
read it in a mirror? :smiley14:Quote:
Originally Posted by Paddy
Maybe this will help.....maybe it won't.
I've figured out I'm being shit on,
but still not sure why.
Nah. Craig's just sayin' if they're going to write "CASTRO" backwards, why don't the write "1962" backwards too.
Will
Got It !
I did not catch that backwards Castro.
Now the cigar seems gimmicky. I thought I had stumbled on some new brand.
Now I see it a cheap marketing ploy.
Not shitting on anyone here, was just trying to make a funny.
Cigar brand names have a long tradition of being marketing exercises having nothing to do with tobacco. Nothing particularly bad (or good) about that.
Operation "Ortsac," however, was an American failure. It seems dumb to me to name something after a failure. However, if you like the way they smoke, then it doesn't matter what the cigars are called.