Stone Mountain Wine Cellars Rico Suave
http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/n...rico_suave.jpg
Maker: Stone Mountain Wine Cellars
Name: Rico Suave
Type: N/A
Vintage: N/A
Alcohol: 20%
One thing I've noticed in consuming wine is the taste difference between wine that has been recently opened, and wine that has been opened for several hours (or even DAYS!!!:smiley3:). When we have guests over for dinner, we'll sometimes open the wine several hours before we plan on serving it to our guests. In my opinion, this allows the wine to breathe a bit better. You could also achieve the same result with a decanter.
Some wines do well opened for longer periods of time. Some do not. Port, in my opinion, is a wine that can be opened and enjoyed for probably up to a month, sometimes more. Rarely does a bottle survive that long at our house, however.
So, when I first opened this bottle, I chose to drink it without a cigar. Figured I'd see what the "recent opening" tasted like, then compare that later after it had been opened for a little while. The tastes were quite different.
Price Point:
I don't have any idea. This was gifted to me. From someone. Here. You know who you are.
Specifics:
I'm finding that any sweet red wine with a reasonably high alcohol content can be "called" a port. I do not have enough of a refined palate to be able to tell the difference. There's nothing about this wine that lets me know what kind of "port" this is - it's a sweet, red wine.
First opening:
Very strong alcohol flavor, and over-pronounced sweetness. On the nose, the wine exudes strong berry and cinnamon notes, but it's simply too strong, almost like an over-fermented syrup. On the tongue, there's a burst of tastes that immediately hit your mouth, then the taste fades. The first (and ONLY!) glass at this sitting is not making a great impression.
Second opening:
The wine has definitely calmed down a bit since it's original opening. The scents aren't quite as overpowering, and the cinnamon/spice is much more pronounced. There's still a touch of the syrupy smell from before, but overall, it's much more of a desirable smell than previous. Likewise, on the tongue, the taste lingers a bit longer on the tongue. The taste is very similar to the smell, and goes down reasonably smooth. It's a bit sweeter than I prefer it to be, but this is incredibly subjective, as ports are classically a sweet wine.
Overall:
It's good. I don't know that I would order a case, but should I find myself in Pine Grove, Pennsylvania, I'd definitely make a point to pick up a bottle. Still a bit too sweet to me, and the complexity was lacking. The taste was just like the scent. Not my favorite, but not bad.
Grade: B