What does "because and few others." mean? Learn how to type Bill.His apology only came because and few others and I decided to "take out the trash" here and keep after him until he made good on all the fake Cubans he traded and put in passes.![]()
The only words of support that I gave him was from a post of his relating to him catching hell at Stogie-chat for the fake cigars. I gave him the benefit of the doubt at the time. Keep in mind this is when he played the "they were fakes and I didn't know" card.I joined Cigarsmokers on April 20th and immediately started in on Blodick. He whined over on the Island the next day about me giving him a hard time, you consoled the sniveling crybaby by telling him that his cigars were real and that the others who claimed they were fake didn’t know what they were talking about. You then said you were going to go over and sign up at Cigarsmokers.
I never stated at LTC that I was signing up here. You have friends who are liars and exaggerators if they say that's the case. Just like the one that made mentioning of a pic. of Leebo's wife that we supposedly had. I would imagine these people are one and the same. They probably like to just start trouble and sit on the sidelines and watch. That person is a liar and outright fraud. He should get off his ass and perhaps post some evidence or STFU.
If you saw a thread at LTC where I mentioned I was coming over here, then you are a liar. I never made one post about CSmokers over there. I invited people from there to come here and then I posted about this site-things like: "Over at CSmokers, I found......" In your world however, that probably constitutes evidence of an asskicking agenda.Nice Bush tactic there Bill, it's obvious that you are good at spinning things into what they are not. You tried this spinning effort with my apology thread post which is an absolute joke.
![]()
And look at my posts. 1 out of 940 mentions Oblik. The rest entirely have to do with cigars and matters of this board. Not one takes you or others to task in your treatment of him. If such a post exists of mine(and it would be easy to find) you would have surely posted it by now. Why haven't you Bill?You did on April 22nd. My my, what a strange coincidence!!! If you did not come over here to “back up” Blodick, then why DID you come over here ONE DAY AFTER posting your pandering words of support to Blodick on the Island?
I can produce thirteen URL's of threads where early on, it was you who was chasing me. I never posted in the "why are we fighting thread?" and I never got on your case. If I joined with less than noble intentions-it doesn't show. I clearly did a shitty job of taking you and others to task if I never responded to your 13 earlier attacks. Yes, I just went about my business and continued to let you screw yourself with your behavior, as the admin rightly called you out for polluting the board with a fight that no one else really cares about. Castles in your mind Bill, just castles in your mind. Now you're a mind reader? Accusation after accusation. The sad thing is that your arguments like the arguments for WMD's. They stick for the short term but don't bear the burden of time and evidence.You saw me getting heat over here and figured you could endear yourself to the site owner and he’d make you a moderator so you could screw with people.
So let's look at the evidence.
Premise: SFG75 came here to defend Oblik.
Evidence
*A post on the apology thread
*An alleged post at LTC that stated I was coming here to kick-ass.
Counter-evidence
*Everyone posted supporting words on the apology thread, my single post regarding him hardly constitutes a formidable argument for the guy.
*1 post out of 940 is hardly a respectable effort to defend someone
*I never posted in the "why are we fighting?" thread.
Your evidence doesn't shine through Bill. Fortunately for you, others are impressed by conjecture and logical inconsistencies.![]()
![]()
Bookmarks