Avatar

[badwhale]

Oh wah. My point was, as I said above, without the special effects and 3D, I thought it was a fairly mediocre movie. By seeing it in 2D, you really shortchanged yourself.

I personally wasn't really offended being called a kind of retard. When it comes to entertainment & things of that sort, you're probably right. The sun and moon and stars have to align correctly for my wife and myself to go see a movie (i.e. 2 year old.) Also, beyond that, we would have to drive a significant distance to see the move in 3D.

I don't read a lot of news, and we don't have cable or Direct TV at the house. I kind of like it that way, but in the same regard, I'm not up on all the new movies coming out, and what's available. My wife wanted to see the movie for different reasons, not to see special effects etc. Did we shortchange ourselves? In hindsight, I guess we did. Oh well. I see a movie so infrequently, that even a 2D sci-fi movie with alot of special effects and a predictable mediocre plot gives me an escape from reality for 3 hours.

Maybe we'll make the arrangements to go see it in 3D now.

Will

[MemphisFred]

I would like to see it.

because the guy invented a new camera to film it in 3D

So do you still have to wear the silly glasses though?