Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Ortsac 1962

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Up shit's creek
    Posts
    1,858

    Default

    I've figured out I'm being shit on,
    but still not sure why.
    It will always be a battle a day between those who want maximum change and those who want to maintain the status quo.
    ~ Gerry Adams

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Bitterville
    Posts
    7,189
    Blog Entries
    117

    Default

    Nah. Craig's just sayin' if they're going to write "CASTRO" backwards, why don't the write "1962" backwards too.

    Will
    The powers that be might take it all away
    Together we burn, together we burn away

    Uncle Tupelo

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Up shit's creek
    Posts
    1,858

    Default

    Got It !
    I did not catch that backwards Castro.
    Now the cigar seems gimmicky. I thought I had stumbled on some new brand.
    Now I see it a cheap marketing ploy.
    It will always be a battle a day between those who want maximum change and those who want to maintain the status quo.
    ~ Gerry Adams

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    1,786
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Not shitting on anyone here, was just trying to make a funny.

    Cigar brand names have a long tradition of being marketing exercises having nothing to do with tobacco. Nothing particularly bad (or good) about that.

    Operation "Ortsac," however, was an American failure. It seems dumb to me to name something after a failure. However, if you like the way they smoke, then it doesn't matter what the cigars are called.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •