Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 40 of 189

Thread: War after war, whether is new one? HISTORY REPEATS

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Oleg281 Guest

    Default

    There should not be indulgences at the court against the international neo-nazism
    and colonialism to the responsible persons, governments and countries who left
    occupational armies in Iraq after the termination of "mandate" in December, 2005.
    The United Nations do not carry out the primary goal any more - preservation
    of the world. One countries try to dictate or impose conditions to other countries.
    It will lead only to war. In the United Nations there is no equality and decisions
    do not reflect opinion of the world community. The United Nations will support
    relative stability of colonialists for some time and will be abolished after.
    The United Nations substitute the reality in Iraq and hides political
    information. In the world there is no validity in international attitudes,
    London and Washington try to involve Moscow into support of occupation,
    as the help in restoration of Iraq. The help is necessary in formation
    of authorities which reflects interests of free and whole state.
    Emancipating movement of Iraq constrains spreading colonialism
    worldwide. Regional organizations which operate constantly and reflect ideology
    of freedom and anticolonialism of the countries, could be the political body
    constraining colonialism.

  2. #2
    Oleg281 Guest

    Default

    Protest performances of administrative sectors of England
    deprived of civil rights grow in England and all is more difficult
    to colonial government to pacify it by ‘gifts’ from London.
    Washington’s financial problems grow day by day because of
    corporate control system constructed on deceits and
    frauds. All this is a consequence of burdens of colonization of Iraq.
    London and Washington continue to remain dictators
    and oppose equality in the international relationships.

  3. #3
    Oleg281 Guest

    Default

    The enemy of London – people of Iraq
    obstruct colonisation of Iraq.
    And while it is not won, London
    creates and invents set of reasons
    for continuation of colonization.

    Emancipating movement in Iraq
    More and more contacts to support
    of the anticolonialistic organizations.
    The international unity in struggle with
    colonialism will make the world free.


  4. #4
    Oleg281 Guest

    Default

    Occupation of Bagdad and establishment of politically-
    -technological colonial regime is the loss of freedom for Iraq.

    The burden of war is very often burdened by weather disasters.
    So for Adolf Hitler heavy test for colonization of the USSR was
    a cold winter. It is necessary to overcome weather disasters for
    the economy of colonialists of Georges Bush in their own territory.
    The basic outcome of war was solved as a rule in fights and battles.
    Arms and expansion of guerrilla movement will become solving in
    emancipating of Bagdad and Iraq.

    The earlier occupation will end, the easier will be to settle
    postcolonial contradictions. The longer occupation will last,
    the stronger will be the punishment of those whose rights
    have been broken.

  5. #5
    Oleg281 Guest

    Default

    I on the side of sunnites
    Sunnites do not go to any tender on colonization of Iraq,
    having chosen struggle for unity of the country and freedom.
    Colonialists still never left the countries by their own will.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •