“Smoking cigars as an art form"

[daysiartpainter]

Daysi, tu cotizacion es ofensivo y inapropiado. Necesitas un traductor para ayudarle a comunicarse mejor en este sitio web. Usted malinterpretado mucho de lo que la gente ha dicho a tu y estamos teniendo problemas para entender lo que usted diciendo tambien.

-Buzz

I never use offense or "bad words" , read this and tell me if you prefer my bad English or this English. I truly appreciate your time and effort...and your Spanish is very good ...Gracias
http://www.lyricsbox.com/george-carl...v-268qwb7.html

[kevin7]

If you can speak three languages you're trilingual. If you can speak two languages you're bilingual. If you can speak only one language you're an American.
~Author Unknown

I cannot understand what you are typing or the message you are trying to convey. I would not get all proud of being multi lingual if no one can understand your fucked up butchering of the Engrish language

[heftysmokes]

I cannot understand what you are typing or the message you are trying to convey. I would not get all proud of being multi lingual if no one can understand your fucked up butchering of the Engrish language

Exactly...I can put a bunch of Spanish or German words together in sentence form as well. That doesn't make me multilingual.


"
It's weird that the air just kind of moves around by itself outside."
-Michael Ian Black

[cinda]

I think that a Cigar magazine, needs to show more cigar news that half naked women. Luckily alive in the USA where I can be expressed freely, Are you agree

Daysi

I wasn't going to say anything in this thread but I feel compelled to to add a comment regarding the above quote, for I disagree that censoring pictures will make it more informative. I 'll begin by saying the only cigar magazine that I have been exposed to is cigar aficionado. Frankly, in my opinion that magazine is a piece of art. The book is over sized, the pictures are bold, glossy, and full of beauty. I have known the covers of the magazine to be adorned with strong, rich, intelligent, funny, worldly men which are all quality's that I find very sexy. For me cigar aficionado magazine does more for me then a playgirl magazine. However, I tell my husband I buy it for the article shhhhhhhhhh! I think its important to remember how information is forwarded is best determine by the audience. The beautiful photos of the cigars and their bans are timeless. Cigar bands and boxes were original created to be beautiful and artsy to lure the person in to an experience before your other senses could be plaited. In addition, cigar advertising encompassed all types woman and how they were portrait in that time. Clad woman are part of that advertising history although I myself have yet to see naked woman in that magazine.
On the other hand, I don't think you could denied the photo of Alejandro Robaina smoking a cigar August 2010 magazine tells a history before any written word is read. Much like your paintings photos in a cigar magazine should capture the history, the culture and the beauty of the cigar 's emancipation to compliant any written articles in the magazine.
I hope this is as clear as mudd!

[mail man]

I agree with Cinda, I read a couple of Archery mags, and in them, they show bikini clad women holding a bow...fortunately, the bow is usually nicer than some of the girls.

The one thing that bothers me about Daysi's posts is that she is crying for us to uphold her FREDOM of speech, but in the same breath, she is crying out for censorship of a magazine that she reads under her own persuasion.

[ggiese]

I wasn't going to say anything in this thread but I feel compelled to to add a comment regarding the above quote, for I disagree that censoring pictures will make it more informative. I 'll begin by saying the only cigar magazine that I have been exposed to is cigar aficionado. Frankly, in my opinion that magazine is a piece of art. The book is over sized, the pictures are bold, glossy, and full of beauty. I have known the covers of the magazine to be adorned with strong, rich, intelligent, funny, worldly men which are all quality's that I find very sexy. For me cigar aficionado magazine does more for me then a playgirl magazine. However, I tell my husband I buy it for the article shhhhhhhhhh! I think its important to remember how information is forwarded is best determine by the audience. The beautiful photos of the cigars and their bans are timeless. Cigar bands and boxes were original created to be beautiful and artsy to lure the person in to an experience before your other senses could be plaited. In addition, cigar advertising encompassed all types woman and how they were portrait in that time. Clad woman are part of that advertising history although I myself have yet to see naked woman in that magazine.
On the other hand, I don't think you could denied the photo of Alejandro Robaina smoking a cigar August 2010 magazine tells a history before any written word is read. Much like your paintings photos in a cigar magazine should capture the history, the culture and the beauty of the cigar 's emancipation to compliant any written articles in the magazine.
I hope this is as clear as mudd!

Clear as can be, Grinella!

But - this is what I have to say about that...

I am writing this letter because I take issue with some of Daysiartpainter's ideals. Although my approach may appear a bit pedantic, by setting some generative point of view against a structural-taxonomical point of view or vice versa, I intend to argue that Daysiartpainter's reasoning is circular and therefore invalid. In other words, she always begins an argument with her conclusion (e.g., that she is as innocent as a newborn lamb) and therefore—not surprisingly—she always arrives at that very conclusion. The law is not just a moral stance. It is the consensus of society on our minimum standards of behavior. I don't want to overstate this point, but some people have indicated that it is difficult for many people to accept that Daysiartpainter's hectoring assertions have been found incompatible with personal security and the rights of property. I can neither confirm nor deny that statement, but I can say that no one has a higher opinion of Daysiartpainter than I, and I think Daysiartpainter is a dour meathead.

Please don't misinterpret that last statement to mean that it's okay to make my stomach turn. That's not at all what it means. Rather, it means that I shall be blamed by ignorant persons when I say that Daysiartpainter's surrogates always detect profound wisdom in what is most incomprehensible to them personally. Cruel as that maxim may appear, her childish "Mine! Mine! Mine! Now! Now! Now!" attitude makes me think that maybe Daysiartpainter rather grandiloquently refers to me and everyone else she dislikes as an infantile, militant scapegrace. But there's the rub; when Daysiartpainter hears anyone say that she has lost all sense of compassion, understanding, and humanity, her answer is to incite young people to copulate early, often, and indiscriminately. That's similar to taking a few drunken swings at a beehive: it just makes me want even more to get us out of the hammerlock in which she is holding us.

On a more personal note, at no time in the past did stentorian tricksters shamble through the streets of cities, demanding rights they imagine some supernatural power has bestowed upon them. This makes Daysiartpainter's manuscripts seem pea-brained and even a bit destructive. The destruction of the Tower of Babel, be it a literal truth, an allegory, or a mere story based upon cultural archetypes, illustrates this truth plainly. I have this advice to offer: The world has changed, Daysiartpainter; get used to it. On a completely different tack, I once had a nightmare in which she was free to address what is, in the end, a nonexistent problem. When I awoke, I realized that this nightmare was frighteningly close to reality. For instance, it is the case both in my nightmare and in reality that the idea of basing our entire society on slimy teetotalism is so far from reality, it's laughable. Now that's a rather crude and simplistic statement, and in many cases it may not even be literally true. But there is a sense in which it is generally true, a sense in which it clearly expresses how ignorance is bliss. This may be why Daysiartpainter's flacks are generally all smiles. Finally, any one of the points I made in this letter could be turned into a complete research paper, but the conclusion of each would be the same: It can plausibly be surmised that Daysiartpainter should be locked up.

[Devil Doc]

Ah fer Christ's sakes! I told you guys we should have stuck to discussing her ass.

Doc.

[cigarsarge]

Ah fer Christ's sakes! I told you guys we should have stuck to discussing her ass.

Doc.

I still maintain it can't be that big.

[buzz]

But - this is what I have to say about that...

My brain... just fell off.



That was awesome George, it was like an abstract painting in word-form.

-Buzz

[cigarsarge]

My brain... just fell off.



That was awesome George, it was like an abstract painting in word-form.

-Buzz

That is the way George normally talks...You out to hear him when his education kicks in. He uses his tongue better than a high dollar whore.

[ggiese]

My brain... just fell off.



That was awesome George, it was like an abstract painting in word-form.

-Buzz

I do what I can with the English language. Unfortunately I speak only one language, so I'm at a bit of a disadvantage with Daisy.

I wonder if anyone can translate that into Spanish for me...

[ggiese]

Ah fer Christ's sakes! I told you guys we should have stuck to discussing her ass.

Doc.

Doc - I did... That's what my dissertation was all about.

[buzz]

I do what I can with the English language. Unfortunately I speak only one language, so I'm at a bit of a disadvantage with Daisy.

I wonder if anyone can translate that into Spanish for me...

Translation: No es prudente discutir con Jorge.

-Buzz

[Paddy]

Way to spaz the fuck out...again....in daysi's blog thread no-less.

Seems to be a trend ...........

[Paddy]

I don't give a shit who would have said it, I would feel the same way, and would have posted what I did.

offending any BOTL was not my intent.

[BigMacFU]

I had a hunch when this thread originally popped up I should avoid it. But after reading George's verbose essay in response to somebody who loves a quote of the day website I have to say, I've only confirmed my original hunch. As Doc said way back towards the beginning, how is it the crazies always find this board?

I feel bad, even though I know George did enjoy penning that piece, that he actually had to waste time doing it. Especially when we haven't smoked in how long?

[TachyCoventry]

Actually I am happy George wrote that, I learned several new words that I am going to try and use in Scrabble!

[MrPlatypus]

Actually I am happy George wrote that, I learned several new words that I am going to try and use in Scrabble!

Anyone you play Scrabble against will think you are some kind of a God if you produce even two of those words!

[cinda]

Clear as can be, Grinella!

But - this is what I have to say about that...

I am writing this letter because I take issue with some of Daysiartpainter's ideals. Although my approach may appear a bit pedantic, by setting some generative point of view against a structural-taxonomical point of view or vice versa, I intend to argue that Daysiartpainter's reasoning is circular and therefore invalid. In other words, she always begins an argument with her conclusion (e.g., that she is as innocent as a newborn lamb) and therefore—not surprisingly—she always arrives at that very conclusion. The law is not just a moral stance. It is the consensus of society on our minimum standards of behavior. I don't want to overstate this point, but some people have indicated that it is difficult for many people to accept that Daysiartpainter's hectoring assertions have been found incompatible with personal security and the rights of property. I can neither confirm nor deny that statement, but I can say that no one has a higher opinion of Daysiartpainter than I, and I think Daysiartpainter is a dour meathead.

Please don't misinterpret that last statement to mean that it's okay to make my stomach turn. That's not at all what it means. Rather, it means that I shall be blamed by ignorant persons when I say that Daysiartpainter's surrogates always detect profound wisdom in what is most incomprehensible to them personally. Cruel as that maxim may appear, her childish "Mine! Mine! Mine! Now! Now! Now!" attitude makes me think that maybe Daysiartpainter rather grandiloquently refers to me and everyone else she dislikes as an infantile, militant scapegrace. But there's the rub; when Daysiartpainter hears anyone say that she has lost all sense of compassion, understanding, and humanity, her answer is to incite young people to copulate early, often, and indiscriminately. That's similar to taking a few drunken swings at a beehive: it just makes me want even more to get us out of the hammerlock in which she is holding us.

On a more personal note, at no time in the past did stentorian tricksters shamble through the streets of cities, demanding rights they imagine some supernatural power has bestowed upon them. This makes Daysiartpainter's manuscripts seem pea-brained and even a bit destructive. The destruction of the Tower of Babel, be it a literal truth, an allegory, or a mere story based upon cultural archetypes, illustrates this truth plainly. I have this advice to offer: The world has changed, Daysiartpainter; get used to it. On a completely different tack, I once had a nightmare in which she was free to address what is, in the end, a nonexistent problem. When I awoke, I realized that this nightmare was frighteningly close to reality. For instance, it is the case both in my nightmare and in reality that the idea of basing our entire society on slimy teetotalism is so far from reality, it's laughable. Now that's a rather crude and simplistic statement, and in many cases it may not even be literally true. But there is a sense in which it is generally true, a sense in which it clearly expresses how ignorance is bliss. This may be why Daysiartpainter's flacks are generally all smiles. Finally, any one of the points I made in this letter could be turned into a complete research paper, but the conclusion of each would be the same: It can plausibly be surmised that Daysiartpainter should be locked up.

Bravo bravo maestro Also I will be using the quote That's similar to taking a few drunken swings at a beehive:

[BigMacFU]

Actually I am happy George wrote that, I learned several new words that I am going to try and use in Scrabble!

Oh no, I wasn't knocking George's essay, just that he had to spend time writing it instead of smoking with me.