Cigar of the week - E. P. Carillo Golosos Cigar

[buzz]

blah, blah, blah.

A hefty cigar

blah, blah, blah.

You guys shouldn't even be smoking this cigar... it's hefty's and if he finds out you've been diggin in his stash there's gonna be Hell Toupee.

[nhcigarfan]

I had one of these last night, different size. It was 5 and 7/8 by maybe 44 or 46. I liked it. It felt heavy for it's size and had a real nice draw. Not tight but not loose. Nice spice up front for the first 1/5 or so. The best way I can explain the smoke was thick and creamy. It was good.

[badwhale]

I had one of these last night, different size. It was 5 and 7/8 by maybe 44 or 46. I liked it. It felt heavy for it's size and had a real nice draw. Not tight but not loose. Nice spice up front for the first 1/5 or so. The best way I can explain the smoke was thick and creamy. It was good.

There ya go cheapercigars. You should cut and paste these tasting notes, and credit nhcigarfan, rather than CigarAficianado...

Will

[CoventryCat86]

Is it possible they meant "shoe" leather instead of "show" leather?

Either way, shoe leather taste, uneven burn and tight draw aren't exactly the characteristics I look for in a cigar.

[CoventryCat86]

I kinda starting to wonder about these guys....

HERE they claim that Padron 1926 are "Anniversary" what a buncha dopes.....

[Paddy]

I had one of these last night, different size. It was 5 and 7/8 by maybe 44 or 46. I liked it. It felt heavy for it's size and had a real nice draw. Not tight but not loose. Nice spice up front for the first 1/5 or so. The best way I can explain the smoke was thick and creamy. It was good.

I agree with NH. I have smoked about 6 of these in the 6x60 format. Great cigar, but maybe a bit mild for a lot of you.