Cigar of the week - E. P. Carillo Golosos Cigar

[nhcigarfan]

I had one of these last night, different size. It was 5 and 7/8 by maybe 44 or 46. I liked it. It felt heavy for it's size and had a real nice draw. Not tight but not loose. Nice spice up front for the first 1/5 or so. The best way I can explain the smoke was thick and creamy. It was good.

[badwhale]

I had one of these last night, different size. It was 5 and 7/8 by maybe 44 or 46. I liked it. It felt heavy for it's size and had a real nice draw. Not tight but not loose. Nice spice up front for the first 1/5 or so. The best way I can explain the smoke was thick and creamy. It was good.

There ya go cheapercigars. You should cut and paste these tasting notes, and credit nhcigarfan, rather than CigarAficianado...

Will

[CoventryCat86]

Is it possible they meant "shoe" leather instead of "show" leather?

Either way, shoe leather taste, uneven burn and tight draw aren't exactly the characteristics I look for in a cigar.

[CoventryCat86]

I kinda starting to wonder about these guys....

HERE they claim that Padron 1926 are "Anniversary" what a buncha dopes.....

[Paddy]

I had one of these last night, different size. It was 5 and 7/8 by maybe 44 or 46. I liked it. It felt heavy for it's size and had a real nice draw. Not tight but not loose. Nice spice up front for the first 1/5 or so. The best way I can explain the smoke was thick and creamy. It was good.

I agree with NH. I have smoked about 6 of these in the 6x60 format. Great cigar, but maybe a bit mild for a lot of you.