Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 33 of 33

Thread: Monte #4 Concerns

  1. #21

    Default

    Throw some in with my FF winnings.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    1,685
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kn1v3s0ut View Post
    Throw some in with my FF winnings.
    Can do. Will do.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    7,539
    Blog Entries
    56

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kn1v3s0ut View Post
    Throw some in with my FF winnings.
    What FF winnings?

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    1,685
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ashauler View Post
    What FF winnings?
    I thought 1st place got 25, 2nd got 0, and 3rd got 5.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    7,539
    Blog Entries
    56

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kingbeefy View Post
    I thought 1st place got 25, 2nd got 0, and 3rd got 5.
    Yes, I seem to remember something very similar. And, now, this box sitting in my office makes sense.
    I'll fly it your way tomorrow.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    1,685
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ashauler View Post
    Yes, I seem to remember something very similar. And, now, this box sitting in my office makes sense.
    I'll fly it your way tomorrow.
    Sounds very rad.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Bitterville
    Posts
    7,191
    Blog Entries
    117

    Default

    I'm going to bust (a similar) one out tonight for non-pictoral review / comparison.
    The powers that be might take it all away
    Together we burn, together we burn away

    Uncle Tupelo

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    1,685
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by badwhale View Post
    I'm going to bust (a similar) one out tonight for non-pictoral review / comparison.
    I hope there are maximum floor scraps in it for you. :)

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Bitterville
    Posts
    7,191
    Blog Entries
    117

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kingbeefy View Post
    I hope there are maximum floor scraps in it for you. :)
    And we're off...
    The powers that be might take it all away
    Together we burn, together we burn away

    Uncle Tupelo

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Bitterville
    Posts
    7,191
    Blog Entries
    117

    Default

    Done. My vote is counterfeit. Kevin, what was your assessment?
    The powers that be might take it all away
    Together we burn, together we burn away

    Uncle Tupelo

  11. Default

    IIRC My assessment was that I couldn't tell if the were fake or not. I think they were old and the cubatobacco seal was legit. I enjoyed mine and since then I have a couple of old assed Cubans that smoked similar. Remember that through the years Cuba made a lot of cigars and all were not rolled by grade 9 rollers making every cigar look like a SigloVI. I have some hella old stuff that seems a lot different than they did in the early 90S,neither better of worse just different.
    The older I get ,the better I was

  12. #32

    Default

    I finally tried one of these yesterday... and it was a turd. Maybe I got the runt of the litter, but yeah, bad. It burned fairly consistently but the draw was horrendous. This surprised me because the cigar was still a bit dry and crispy, esp the wrapper. The taste was just a blah kind of tobacco flavor, no real character or defining tastes to it. They look cool in the humidor, and that's about it. Thanks KB for trying to resurrect these and for giving me these latest two. I will think of you now, as you've read my review, reacting in this manner..

    https://youtu.be/TKIFa7aBt0U?t=14

  13. #33
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    1,685
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kn1v3s0ut View Post
    I finally tried one of these yesterday... and it was a turd. Maybe I got the runt of the litter, but yeah, bad. It burned fairly consistently but the draw was horrendous. This surprised me because the cigar was still a bit dry and crispy, esp the wrapper. The taste was just a blah kind of tobacco flavor, no real character or defining tastes to it. They look cool in the humidor, and that's about it. Thanks KB for trying to resurrect these and for giving me these latest two. I will think of you now, as you've read my review, reacting in this manner..

    https://youtu.be/TKIFa7aBt0U?t=14
    Thanks for the review. I still am not sure about then being legit. If I had to lean I would lean to "no". Though, the blandness could be a product of age as well. As I understand it, cigars will age well to a point, but after that aging will result in less body and flavor. It could also be a way overaged fake.

    I did my best!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •