Results 1 to 20 of 300

Thread: Review These - Reviews

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sterling, VA
    Posts
    867

    Default

    Chris, you did a good job reviewing. You were on the money for both I believe, but sorry for the plug, I haven't had issues with that cigar.

    #1 - was a Romeo y Julieta #2 (ISOM), construction wasn't good, but the flavours were definitely there. Obviously the more expensive of the two. Good job on that review. I'm glad you enjoyed it. I was guessing this would be my best chance of giving you a cigar you've never tried before as a review. I hope I succeeded.

    #2 - was Arte Cubano Toro - it's definitely a mild smoke. I found the construction was near perfect also, and of all the ones I've smoked, never had a plug problem. Again, sorry for that misfortune.

    Paul, I've been busy this week. THE last smoke I had was the #1 review I did. I'm itching to smoke again, but I don't have the luxury of smoking inside, and work is kicking my butt......(normally beg. and end of month is the busiest for me.) I will try to suck it up and review it before the weekend.

    Andrew

    Quote Originally Posted by chefchris View Post
    I did these reviews in the order that I smoked the cigars.

    Cigar # 2
    Looking at this cigar, it is very well contructed. Cut and lit fine. Instantly had a tight draw. So tight my jaw is actually sore. After further examining, I found the cigar to be plugged. I gently massaged it out and this opened it up a little more, but not much. This cigar is very mild. I mean MILD. So mild I contemplated not typing "mild" in all caps. It's only strong points are it's good construction (minus the plug) and it's even burn. I would could consider this a bland, not mild but comatose cigar. What little flavor I was getting was not good. Made it half way though before letting it die. My jaw could not handle it.


    Cigar # 1
    This cigar is rough looking, very veiny. Straight up ugly. Cut was ok, a little messy which makes me wonder if this is machine made. Now right off the bat there was something that I've never tasted in a cigar. I cannot put my finger on it. Even the smoke smelled different. It's toasty, kinda twangy. This cigar started on the mild side of medium, then moves into a more of a medium smoke halfway through. This one also had a tight draw, but didn't piss me off as bad because I enjoyed the flavor and aroma. The draw loosens up about halfway through. The burn got a little off at times. The strength really intensified towards the end, but I really enjoyed the last 2" of it. All around a good cigar. Wouldn't mind having a few of these in the trunk.



    Now, if I rated these cigars on construction I would have to say that Number # 2 was the most expensive. But now if I rated it on taste, I would go with Number # 1.

    But my final decision is number 2 was the more expensive, although it honestly was a tough decision.


    This is an awesome idea, i'll probably wait and let everyone get a turn in and try again. Lots of fun. i'm lame.

    Thanks FunkyCold!
    Last edited by FunkyCold5; 01-31-2007 at 09:06 AM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •