Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Humidity & Cigars

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    38° 59′ 26″ N, 77° 1′ 35″ W
    Posts
    1,476

    Default

    I had two strong cigars before the CAO Brazili the other day and that may have affected the taste, but I feel like I've experienced that before. Even still I'm looking forwad to CLS.
    The very existence of flame-throwers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done." -unknown

  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cabaiguan Juan View Post
    I had two strong cigars before the CAO Brazili the other day and that may have affected the taste, but I feel like I've experienced that before. Even still I'm looking forwad to CLS.
    My humidor actually dropped to 67%. How long had it been there? Not long probably. Anyway, at 67% the cigar seemed a lot drier and was not as tasty as the one at 70%. I still don't know for sure...I'll get my humidor up to 70% and try again.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    38° 59′ 26″ N, 77° 1′ 35″ W
    Posts
    1,476

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cls515 View Post
    My humidor actually dropped to 67%. How long had it been there? Not long probably. Anyway, at 67% the cigar seemed a lot drier and was not as tasty as the one at 70%. I still don't know for sure...I'll get my humidor up to 70% and try again.
    The saga continues...How did the one at 67% compair to the ones at 65%?
    The very existence of flame-throwers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done." -unknown

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cabaiguan Juan View Post
    The saga continues...How did the one at 67% compair to the ones at 65%?
    It actually felt more dried out. My humi is back up to 70, more info to come...
    EDIT - After smoking another Monte #4 at 70%, I can see a difference but it is not as significant as the inconsistency in the cigar. I can tell the #4 is very inconsistent. When they are on, like the #2, they are some of the best cigars, period. But as far as my experience goes the "on" ones are few and far between. Out of 5, one was outstanding, while the other four were good. I was surprised about the #4, I expected more of a milder, woody character. Man, these are some little firecrackers at six months. I think maybe some age will tone them down and give them extra character, maybe not. I'd like to have 5 more with at least a year of age. Back to the topic, I liked the #4's better at 70% because they did not seem as dry and harsh. They were more mellow, but still full bodied. But inconsistency in the line is the main flaw as the two at 70% I did smoke were not the same monsters.
    Last edited by cls515; 10-10-2006 at 09:58 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •