Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Fonseca Habana Seleccion

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Here and there.
    Posts
    973

    Default Fonseca Habana Seleccion



    I had the pleasure of smoking one of these on this beautiful warm afternoon. I believe the size (7x50 or so) is called the Seleccion #1, and it retails for $6-7 or so.

    The construction was absolutely flawless, and the cigar had a beautiful color and sheen to it (unfortunately, my cell phone camera has a hard time picking up on this).

    The burn and ash were both perfect. As you can see in the picture, the ash was a beige-grey color and held on for well over two inches. It only required the slightest touch-up to the burn towards the very end of the smoke.

    Flavor-wise, it was absolutely delicious. Lots of sweet, earthy flavors that were strong but not overpowering.

    I'd highly recommend this cigar.
    Last edited by JFellows; 05-20-2007 at 08:21 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles, California
    Posts
    207

    Default

    I would never smoke a cigar just for the flavors. Waste of time in my book. I'd rather smoke a cigar that tastes like a turd with some body to it than one that hints at cherries and mint, but is like sucking on air.

    Case in point, today I smoked a CAO Brazilla, and I can tell why people would like it. It had unique flavors that stood out, but was so mild and drew too easily, with minimal smoke. I was disappointed to say the least.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Here and there.
    Posts
    973

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HersheyWalker View Post
    I would never smoke a cigar just for the flavors. Waste of time in my book. I'd rather smoke a cigar that tastes like a turd with some body to it than one that hints at cherries and mint, but is like sucking on air.

    Case in point, today I smoked a CAO Brazilla, and I can tell why people would like it. It had unique flavors that stood out, but was so mild and drew too easily, with minimal smoke. I was disappointed to say the least.
    What in god's name are you talking about? Are you drunk?
    Last edited by JFellows; 05-20-2007 at 09:48 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Billings MT
    Posts
    2,885
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JFellows View Post
    What in god's name are you talking about? Are you drunk?

    I'm going to have to agree with the Dude on this one.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles, California
    Posts
    207

    Default

    Just throwing in my honest opinion. Different strokes for different folks and all that.


  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Here and there.
    Posts
    973

    Default

    Haha...fair enough, I suppose. Although I'm still a bit confused about your comment...the Habana Seleccion gave out ample volumes of smoke, had a solid medium body, etc...Oh well!


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles, California
    Posts
    207

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JFellows View Post
    Haha...fair enough, I suppose. Although I'm still a bit confused about your comment...the Habana Seleccion gave out ample volumes of smoke, had a solid medium body, etc...Oh well!

    I did not know that.

    I assumed from the absence of any adjectives describing the cigar's strength that it had none.

    Then I assumed that your second post was related to me not liking the well liked CAO Brazilla.



  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Billings MT
    Posts
    2,885
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HersheyWalker View Post
    Just throwing in my honest opinion. Different strokes for different folks and all that.

    I guess I just don't understand why you would rather smoke something that tastes like shit just because it puts out a lot of smoke...but hey, whatever works for you I suppose.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Here and there.
    Posts
    973

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by heftysmokes View Post
    I guess I just don't understand why you would rather smoke something that tastes like shit just because it puts out a lot of smoke...but hey, whatever works for you I suppose.
    That too. I'd rather drink a really tasty low-proof beer than get drunk off of 10% skunky rat piss.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles, California
    Posts
    207

    Default

    That is where we differ my friend.


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    California, PA
    Posts
    234

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HersheyWalker View Post
    I would never smoke a cigar just for the flavors. Waste of time in my book. I'd rather smoke a cigar that tastes like a turd with some body to it than one that hints at cherries and mint, but is like sucking on air.

    Case in point, today I smoked a CAO Brazilla, and I can tell why people would like it. It had unique flavors that stood out, but was so mild and drew too easily, with minimal smoke. I was disappointed to say the least.
    Quote Originally Posted by JFellows View Post
    What in god's name are you talking about? Are you drunk?
    Just reread this. Hilarious!

  12. #12

    Default

    I'm confused. Basically, what you are saying, Hershey, is that flavor in a cigar is the last thing you care about? For me - and I would imagine 99.9% of the members of this forum - would rank flavor at the top of the list. However, a really tight draw or poor burn characteristics would certainly interfere with the overall enjoyment. But a lot of folks can overlook these flaws in favor of flavor. Hey, that rhymes!

    Anyway, back to the Fonseca Habana... I concur, it is an excellent cigar!!!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •