Fuente Fuente Opus X Forbidden X + 1 for raffle, to benefit the American Red Cross

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Corona Gigante

Q: How do I know the cigars are what you say they are?

A: The person who gifted me the Opus X and I have had our personal differences, but there's never been a question about his integrity or the quality of his collection. In addition, the band, the sealed glass tube, etc, would make this a very difficult item to fake. I purchased the other cigar, a Partagas Salamone, in good faith from what I believe to be a reputable source. It looks great and smells great--to me, anyway. I have no doubts about its authenticity. But dumb newbies like me get ripped off all the time, right? So can we just consider it to be a bonus mystery cigar which may turn out to be a real treat? If you don't want to take a chance on it, I'll happily send you just the Opus X and dispose of the other cigar for you myself. Very happily, in fact.

---

Wow, Corona Gigante, you continue to shock me with your bullshit. :smiley22:

When I saw Nicholas (Corona Gigante) promoting this raffle with the Forbidden X and the mysterious unbanded Salamone, I was immediately reminded of an exchange of PMs we had on August 23rd, 2005, regarding a source Nicholas had been using to purchase 'cubans'.

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Corona Gigante

Whenever I've felt rich--not often enough--I've done a bit of business with Joe XxXxxx at Vendor Z. I've generally been happy with the results. The boxes look kosher and the cigars taste fine after resting for a week or so. Still, I was wondering if you guys have heard anything positive or negative about him. He's based in Genève, he quotes all his prices in USD, the prices are competitive with Vendor C but shipping is included whereas Vendor C want to stick me for $40(!)

Your opinion would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Nicholas.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hugh Jorgan

I would be very cautious about any "cubans" you have received from Vendor Z. I would highly recommend that you do not use them in passes or trades, but simply enjoy them yourself. The worst thing that can happen on the forums is to mistakenly pass fakes -- it is a black mark that is hard to live down.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Corona Gigante

[Will do. Or rather, won't do.

Thanks,

Nicholas.

---

---

The Vendor Z in question is an infamous purveyor of fake 'cubans'.

It has been confirmed by Corona Gigante that the Partagas Salamone that he included in the raffle, is in fact, one of the cigars he purchased from Vendor Z. :smiley21:
Corona Gigante was warned about the authenticity of all cigars he had received from Vendor Z on August 23, 2005 and he acknowledged the problem , yet here he claims he has no doubt about its authenticity? Bullshit.

Knowingly passing cigars of questionable origin is a classless and scumbag move. I have no doubt that Corona Gigante chose this cigar to help pad this raffle, and artificially increase it's potential value. Stating he had no doubt about the authenticity of Vendor Z or the Salamone is a blatant lie. Including the statement:

"But dumb newbies like me get ripped off all the time, right? So can we just consider it to be a bonus mystery cigar which may turn out to be a real treat? If you don't want to take a chance on it, I'll happily send you just the Opus X and dispose of the other cigar for you myself. Very happily, in fact."

..is a smoke screen when he knew the Salamone was questionable.

Nicholas, you are a scumbag.

You gotta be kidding me. :smiley3:

corona gigante, guys like you ultimately slit their own throats. Someone snapped this photo of a new gadget you recently installed in your back yard:

http://theseoultimes.com/ST/db2/imag...0630190619.jpg

Looks like you want to make sure you don't miss :smiley2:

Oh crap!!..
Not good. If you have doubts about a cigar.. Why would you ever offer it up. Bad move.
EVen when a member on here warns you about this particular company. Not good.!

Hugh, thanks for your post, it's finally all coming together.

I QUOTE THIS FROM CORONA'S THREAD:

"I forget the name of it right now and the band fell off and rolled under the table just before I took the picture, but I promise you it smells as good as it looks."


THREAD: http://www.cigarsmokers.com/t2236-op...red-cross.html

:smiley35:

Corona you REALLY are a scumbag. Hugh's post PROVES that you KNEW it may have been a FAKE and you DELIBERATELY TOOK THE BAND OFF because you were probably AFRAID someone may have been able to identify it as a FAKE by just looking at the BAND.

I'm through with your b.s. and your dishonesty. Do yourself a favor and LEAVE this forum. After seeing this, I can't understand why ANYONE would be BEHIND you now.

YOU'RE DONE

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Corona Gigante

Bill, you're really clutching at straws here. You think you can still see flaws in my procedure for determining the winner, but you don't seem to be willing to offer solutions or even to define the problem clearly enough for me to fix it.

The tiebreaker rule is the first one I came up with that seemd fair. That it acts to encourage people to get their entires in earlier rather than later is obviously an attractive feature, but if you can offer an alternative, I would like to hear it.

Please explain how diz has a better chance of winning than justin. I don't see it. Maybe there's a mistake in the procedure I outlined or maybe I just didn't make it clear enough. BTW, I have no idea who either of these guys are and I think they would probably tell you the same thing.

I think I see what you mean about assigning you 44 or 1 and assigning someone else 43 and 2. That would make a difference to your chance of winning but it doesn't seem like a very significant difference and, if I understand your point, it would only come into play if none of the other assigned numbers come up in the lottery drawing. The chance of that happening decreases as the number of entrants increases.

Tell you what. Say you'll enter and I'll let you pick your own number, so long as it's not already assigned. You have to promise me that if you win, you'll not tell any lies about the contents of the package I send you.

I think what you've missed is that in some ways the best possible outcome for me is that you enter and win. Not because I think you might stop post-stalking me (although I can't say I would miss it much) but that it would be pretty conclusive evidence of my integrity. I don't particularly care how many times you call me a POS or whatever--water off a duck's back, mate--I've been called worse than that by better than you--but I would be deeply wounded if I thought you doubted my integrity.

If you don't see that, maybe you're not anywhere as near intelligent as you give yourself credit for being.

---

"Clutching at straws" you stupid sonofabitch, SilentChamber was kind enough to explain your stupidity to you but not until you attacked me YET AGAIN. You were DEAD WRONG when you stated that if there are only two guys in the auction, one with #14 and one with #27 that they both have a 50-50 shot of winning. Reread TheSilentChamber's post which is written in plain and simple English, so simple that a 6th grader can grasp the concept because as he pointed out, the guy with #14 only has a 20 (well he said 19 but he meant 20 :smiley2: ) in 44 chance of winning while the guy with #27 has a 24 in 44 chance in winning. That is NOT "50-50" unless your calculator is broken. The guy with #14 has a 45-55 chance of winning and the guy with #27 has a 55-45 chance of winning. If you can't understand that, write the numbers 1 - 44 on a sheet of paper and follow that up by putting the name of the winner next to each number. It's highly unlikely that in your continued quest of wanting to start trouble with me you will ever see that I'm right and you're wrong but that shouldn't surprise anyone here since you're too arrogant and too much of an asshole to ever admit you're wrong. :smiley2:

Sorry corona gigante, it's not my responsibility to fix your auction for you. LMAO, you don't see how assigning the number 1 or 44 to someone and 2 or 43 to another is a problem? HOLY crap man, you're either REALLY STUPID or my guess is you just want troll for trouble. :smiley36:

My suggestion is don't do your auction at all. There are so many problems with it:

1. Just about everyone here and on CigarPass as well as many members from Club Stogie think you're a complete asshole, you've created that reputation ALL ON YOUR OWN with your shitty attitude and continued attacks on me and others. This is a bad time for you to try and salvage your reputation which is so far in the toilet, you're beyond hope.
2. You're auctioning off GIFTED cigars and I know you've tried to justify this but IMO you can't
3. The Partagas Salamone is a fake, you know it, you were told this, you acknowledged this, said you wouldn't pass it along YET YOU DID ANYWAY.

When you're WRONG, you continue with your attacks and smart assed comments, that's pretty arrogant and stupid.

Keep digging..................

I strongly resent being accused of "knowlingly (sic) passing off" a fake cuban when I've taken pains all along to explain that, even though as far as I can tell it is the real deal, it should be considered as a "bonus mystery cigar."

With regard to the vendor, I have heard one unsubstantiated third hand negative report--and not from Bill, I might add--when I asked him at the time for his opinion he told me he had never used them. I agreed not to repeat the story I heard but I would have to say it was very far from conclusive and did not involve my source directly.

For whatever it is worth, my own experience with this source has been completely satisfactory. I have spoken to other people who have also been completely satisfied, and I have read comments from various satisifed users on another cigar board. I understand that discussion of sources in public is frowned upon, but I am happy to discuss this matter more fully privately.

And in addition, if I had wanted to knowlingly pass off a fake, don't you think I would have claimed to have gotten it from one of the "approved" sources? I'm sure we could all list several quite easily. I have been nothing but open and above board from the beginning of this sorry affair.

Backpeddle, double-talk, lie, deflect, flame then try and make everyone feel sorry for you etc. :smiley36:

I may have been wrong for thinking you were Scotty at first but gezuz, you're WORSE than he is :smiley29:

Just leave this board Corona. I'm tired of you polluting this board and no one wants you here. You're a huge disruption and I'm not going to tolerate it anymore.

After reading what I read from Hugh, you basically had no regard and disrespected all of us by trying to pass that possible fake. 'Band fell off and rolled under the table when I took the picture...' :smiley35:

No one wants you here, and no "rescucers" will be here for you either. :smiley36:

You're a pop-star one second wonder....NOW LEAVE.... :smiley34:

nick..i have a question for you...does it bother you that nobody seems to really give a flying fuck about the raffle??.......two entrants from three boards...admittedly,this was/is a nice gesture,but really...it's about as popular as a fart in church. maybe it's just you.....stop challenging bill,and others.....see if you can find a way to be accepted...or move on and enjoy your hobby alone.

Nicky, if you don't know the difference between a green and black band Fuente, I'm sure your knowledge of Habanos is nonexistent!

You're so full of yourself that you have no idea wtf you're talking about.

See ya

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CoventryCat86

Backpeddle, double-talk, lie, deflect, flame then try and make evryone feel sorry for you etc. :smiley36:

---

Can anyone tell me how any of that is true?

You really live in the looking-glass world, don't you Bill?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Leebo

Nicky, if you don't know the difference between a green and black band Fuente, I'm sure your knowledge of Habanos is nonexistent!

You're so full of yourself that you have no idea wtf you're talking about.

See ya

---

what is the difference? i really don't know. **cowers in fear**

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bigpoppapuff

...it's about as popular as a fart in church...

---

LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :smiley36: :smiley36: :smiley36:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bigpoppapuff

...see if you can find a way to be accepted

---

It's too late for that, he's DONE.

Corona are you STILL talking? I thought we told you to LEAVE. GTFO...no one cares about your lies!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Corona Gigante

Can anyone tell me how any of that is true?

You really live in the looking-glass world, don't you Bill?

---

On the contrary, you were doing ALL the things I said you were and you are too full of yourself, too full of shit and too arrogant to see it any other way. :smiley36:

Keep digging........

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CoventryCat86

Keep digging........

---

No more digging, he's had enough time to play in his little Nicky sandbox. :smiley36:

Can we take away his shovel now, pull him out of the worthless hole he's in, and ban him for good now? :smiley36:

What's that smell....

Oh, I know it's Corona and the pile of....he's gotten himself into. :smiley36:

How to piss of an Admin:

Start up a new thread in the wrong place (trades, raffles, passes, etc go in the Exchange) for the second time after the admin has moved the first thead to Politics for obvious reasons.

:smiley32:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Drake

what is the difference? i really don't know. **cowers in fear**

---

The green band is a blend created by Arturo Fuente himself. It is representative of the tax seals they used to have under the band back in Cuba.

The black band is not blended by Arturo...

http://www.cigaraficionado.com/Cigar...47,126,00.html

See first post. No more mystery cigar. Bad idea, obviously.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Corona Gigante

See first post. No more mystery cigar. Bad idea, obviously.

---

Well, you certainly have earned the Hopeless Dumbfuck of the Year award!