Hot Potato " with all the trimmings" Pass

**prophetic_joe** · 06-08-2010, 10:44 PM

So am I to assume no objections or is the resounding silence an indicator that I screwed the pooch on this one?

**badwhale** · 06-08-2010, 11:25 PM

Originally Posted by prophetic_joe

So am I to assume no objections or is the resounding silence an indicator that I screwed the pooch on this one?

LOL. They didn't look objectionable to me, but I'm not "da judge" either.

Will

**prophetic_joe** · 06-09-2010, 01:24 PM

Originally Posted by badwhale

LOL. They didn't look objectionable to me, but I'm not "da judge" either.

Will

Well damnit where's George when you need him?

**ggiese** · 06-09-2010, 01:26 PM

Originally Posted by prophetic_joe

So am I to assume no objections or is the resounding silence an indicator that I screwed the pooch on this one?

Sorry - I was sleeping the entire time - between when you posted your proposed puts/takes and now... You gotta let us old geezer's get our beauty sleep, or it ain't gonna be pretty - literally!

Hmmm... #1 - I can see that. #2 - I can see that too...

Give me your thoughts about #3 proposed trade - The Camacho Triple Maduro torpedo vs. an '02 858 Sun Grown... I'm on the fence about that trade - but could be convinced with good reasoning.

**prophetic_joe** · 06-09-2010, 03:13 PM

The main reasoning behind it is that I'm really not sure how to value the 858 SG 02 so instead I looked at what was taken when it was put. Going by the value of the Anejo Shark (msrp of $10.25) I put in the triple due to it's msrp being around $10.50 or so. I forget the actual figure now. I wasn't sure if Ken was undervaluing his SG or not.

If given an estimated value of the 858 though I would gladly change my put to something that may be more in line.

(Found actual figure, Triple Maduro $10.90)

**ggiese** · 06-09-2010, 04:46 PM

Originally Posted by prophetic_joe

The main reasoning behind it is that I'm really not sure how to value the 858 SG 02 so instead I looked at what was taken when it was put. Going by the value of the Anejo Shark (msrp of $10.25) I put in the triple due to it's msrp being around $10.50 or so. I forget the actual figure now. I wasn't sure if Ken was undervaluing his SG or not.

If given an estimated value of the 858 though I would gladly change my put to something that may be more in line.

(Found actual figure, Triple Maduro $10.90)

That's the challenge with Anejo Sharks and aged 858 sungrowns. Both are fairly hard to find cigars (some would even say downright impossible).

I sincerely do not know the answer to this question. I'm not much of a Camacho fan (to each his own) so please forgive my ignorance. Are the Camacho Triple Maduro's a Limited Edition/Release of some form?

**prophetic_joe** · 06-09-2010, 06:12 PM

Originally Posted by ggiese

That's the challenge with Anejo Sharks and aged 858 sungrowns. Both are fairly hard to find cigars (some would even say downright impossible).

I sincerely do not know the answer to this question. I'm not much of a Camacho fan (to each his own) so please forgive my ignorance. Are the Camacho Triple Maduro's a Limited Edition/Release of some form?

No they are not. If we are looking for a more rare cigar versus dollar for dollar would you consider a WOAM from 06 to be more along the lines?