Not all cigar companies own their own fields, so they have to buy it from whomever they can. As a result, one year their cigars can be really good, another year just okay, and another it can suck. It's innoconsistent. The brands I listed all own their own fields, allowing them to have a consistent product.
Last edited by Xavier; 11-08-2010 at 01:14 PM.
"Top-notch" is subjective, but I will say that these guys own their own fields (to my knowledge) and their product is supposed to be of consistent quality.
If you have mastered the craft, sure, why not?
Man, your ignorance is amazing. What about guys that grow and process tobacco, but don't roll their own lines of cigars? Could they have mastered that craft? Or, what about guys that roll their own cigars, but purchase their tobacco from these growers? Could they have mastered the craft of selecting tobacco? Are growers or manufactures responsible for the quality of the cigars produced?
Oh, and while we're at it, what "qualities" are we talking about? Better not be those subjective ones like "flavor" or "profile".........
All I know is, there are some brands that will put out a line of cigars under the name "x" and it will be a great smoke one year. Then the next year, that same brand and that same line may not be as good. That's because they do not own their own fields.
Yes, there's more to the process than just growing the tobacco and/or purchasing it. You have to age it, roll it, and process the whole thing. There are tons of aspects in the whole business, but one of those is an inconsistency as a result of getting different tobacco from different places, as opposed to brands that own their own fields and have their own ways of doing things, like Davidoff (and family), Garcia & Garcia, and Artuo Fuente.
Better listen up ash, you're gettin' schooled on growin' tobaccy!
Xavier,
How the hell do you come up with this stuff. You've said since yesterday that you've only smoked 30 or so cigars. How do you even know what you're saying about smoke "x" to be true?
Could it be possible that some companies use a better quality tobacco for the OR, and then switch some something lesser once they know people like it?
Could it be possible that certain lines get bought out by another retailer and the blend gets fucked with?
Listen, better than trying to have the last word in every thread, why don't you try taking hefty's advice and read through the boards, learn, smoke some cigars, listen, chime in occasionally. In other words, stop trying to be johnny tuffnuts who's going to take on this whole board. Trust me, you're not going to win.
Will
The powers that be might take it all away
Together we burn, together we burn away
Uncle Tupelo
"...all roads lead to cigars."
-Cinda
"You will not change this forum. Simple as that. Accept it or move on, or you will be escorted from the premises."
-Shagaroo
"Maybe you should just stop trying to be witty?"
-Ashauler
"Rule 17: Don’t turn your back on bears, men you have wronged, or the dominant turkey during mating season."
-Dwight Schrute
"Fuck I just like smoking. Who am I kidding?"
-Badwhale
"If you want to start a fuckin' hobby, start it."
-Shelby07
Please listen to everyone's advice. Stop posting for a little while and read. It will be better off for you in the long run. Trust me. I'm not trying to be a dick, I am just trying to help you out.
Which embargo did he start smoking after?
So, to paraphrase your above post:
"I know virtually nothing about cigars that isn't based on the views and or experiences of someone else. These opinions, without any independent verification on my part, are believed by me to be the gospel. Oh, and I read alot of this on the internet, so it must be true too."
Listen, in all honesty, everyone has been very nice and tolerant.....even patient, with you. Your act is starting to wear very thin and I suspect that the kindness and patience won't last much longer.
If you're looking for a board where you can post as often as you want, and make as little sense as you dare, head on over to puff.com. Honestly, I think it would be a much nicer fit for you.
I see. Did your tobacconist also mention brands being sold to competition? Or contracted by a big distributor (read:CI)?
For instance, if a company is bopping along making X amount of fantastic cigars doesn't it stand to reason the quality may go down when they're asked to make x*50 to fill a large contract? They still may be using only their own tobacco, but it's quite possible they're using leaf to fill their order they may have in the past, deemed unsuitable.
I'm sure your old cigar smoking guru is a wealth of knowledge, and you're lucky to have someone there to learn from. All I'm saying is, don't come around typing "this is fact" without considering the fact that you may not have all the background to make an informed statement.
"...all roads lead to cigars."
-Cinda
"You will not change this forum. Simple as that. Accept it or move on, or you will be escorted from the premises."
-Shagaroo
"Maybe you should just stop trying to be witty?"
-Ashauler
"Rule 17: Don’t turn your back on bears, men you have wronged, or the dominant turkey during mating season."
-Dwight Schrute
"Fuck I just like smoking. Who am I kidding?"
-Badwhale
"If you want to start a fuckin' hobby, start it."
-Shelby07
saviour clearly believes everything he reads and/or hears, regardless of its source as long as it's some form of data. While his personal knowledge might be limited, he has heard or seen enough information from "experts" (using the term loosely) to form a conclusion which has some form of basis in "logic". And while the logic might be flawed - it is, in fact, some form of logic.
savioiur's been given all kinds of hints, advice, kicks in the butt, etc. about his faux pas' and social misgivings. By saviour's own words - he's trying to find his "place" and he's rapidly finding that "place" he feels comfortable, despite our community's best efforts!
In other words (for those that "habla") - saviour doesn't "get it", and is not likely to "get it" any time soon.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks