
Originally Posted by
drew_goring
Well, that that would be an accurate comparison except for one small detail. I don't remember the last time the cellophane on a (premium) cigar was sealed. If a cigar is really that offensive or smelly that I could compare it to a smelly piece of food, the first place that cigar would be going is the front lawn.
I also find the idea that a dog rocket will make an Opus "drop in flavor" by putting them side by side in the humi laughable.
And I was really more referring to your statements about aging to be untrue. Leaving the cello on will have no effect on how a cigar "retains moisture". There becomes a time when your cigars and humidor will reach equilibrium where the cellophaned cigars will contain the same amount of moisture as the non-cello'd sticks (which contain the same amount of moisture as the humidor). Granted the cello may sligtly increase the time it takes for your cigars to reach equilibrium, this time would be measured in days, which is rather insignificant when you consider the cigar aging process.
I am wondering how you came to the conclusion that a cigar will "age better" with the cello off when compared to a cigar with the cello on. Also, what does a cedar lining have to do with the aging process?
Bookmarks