Results 1 to 20 of 52

Thread: Review These Pass II Reviews

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    7,539
    Blog Entries
    56

    Default



    A - Famous Nicargua - $3
    B - La Aurora 1495 - $6

    Nice job Chris!!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    New Iberia, LA
    Posts
    484

    Default

    Good job guys. I will start smoking mine this weekend and post my review early next week.
    I was lucky enough to get a Diamond Crown Maximus in the last couple of days, so it was nice to see a review, thanks.

  3. #3

    Default Baggie 14

    This baggie contained two robustos.

    Cigar A - Slightly smaller ring guage of the two it would measure closer to 48-49 than the traditional 50. It had a coarse, veiny, dry, medium brown wrapper. The roll was somewhat lumpy which was even more evident with an uneven burn. I would guess the filler to be a blend of Dominican and Porta Rican or possibly even Mexican. It was less than I would want to smoke for an every day stick.

    Cigar B - Traditional 5x50 robusto. Nice dark Habano looking, maybe a Sumatra wrapper. Fairly smooth, tight, slightly oily and a very even roll with a perfect cap. This was a full bodied cigar with some spiciness, and thick, creamy smoke. It burned nearly perfect with a light grey ash. I would guess that it is a blend of Nicaraguan and Honduran. I enjoyed this cigar. I am anxious to learn what it was so that I might purchase some.

    Without question, Cigar B is the more expensive of the two.

    Thanks Ashauler for your dedication to make this a better community.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    7,539
    Blog Entries
    56

    Default

    Nice reviews as always DW......you hit it smack on.

    A- Don Thomas Clasico Robusto $2.13
    B- Cabaiguan Belicoso Fino $8.94




    Quote Originally Posted by DeeDubya View Post
    This baggie contained two robustos.

    Cigar A - Slightly smaller ring guage of the two it would measure closer to 48-49 than the traditional 50. It had a coarse, veiny, dry, medium brown wrapper. The roll was somewhat lumpy which was even more evident with an uneven burn. I would guess the filler to be a blend of Dominican and Porta Rican or possibly even Mexican. It was less than I would want to smoke for an every day stick.

    Cigar B - Traditional 5x50 robusto. Nice dark Habano looking, maybe a Sumatra wrapper. Fairly smooth, tight, slightly oily and a very even roll with a perfect cap. This was a full bodied cigar with some spiciness, and thick, creamy smoke. It burned nearly perfect with a light grey ash. I would guess that it is a blend of Nicaraguan and Honduran. I enjoyed this cigar. I am anxious to learn what it was so that I might purchase some.

    Without question, Cigar B is the more expensive of the two.

    Thanks Ashauler for your dedication to make this a better community.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    New Iberia, LA
    Posts
    484

    Default

    Good job DeeDubya, enjoyed the review. I guess I'm up.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    New Iberia, LA
    Posts
    484

    Default

    I decided on bag 11. Both we're light colored wrappers. One being a torpedo and the other more like a churchhill. Both 6 inches and around 50 ring gauge. Looking at them without bands, you would think it was the same cigar.

    Cigar A:

    This cigar felt a little soft around the center, a few veins, and light in color. I cut the cap and the pre light draw seemed fine, toasted the foot. It was a bit harder to light than other cigars. First draw seemed to have a little spice and sweet taste that only lasted about 5 minutes. That was replaced with a harsher earthy taste. The second third is were the problem started, it started getting very harsh and unpleasant. Then the wrapper started to unwrap!! After about 5 minutes the wrapper fell off! I had never had this happen before, it did expose a darker shade of tobacco underneath. I put it to rest shortly after that.

    Cigar B:

    This cigar felt as if had a better construction than A, it also had a few veins and light in color. The pre-light draw was better so I went ahead and toasted the foot. It lit well and burned even through the whole cigar. The firts third had subtle hints of earth and nuts. It put out alot of smoke and was a lot better that A. The burn still was close to perfect throughout the second third. The taste picked up more of the earthy tones but still a faint nutty taste. This lasted for the last third as well. I nubbed it. This was a very enjoyable cigar.

    Putting aside the wrapper issue and comparing even just the first third of both cigars, I would say B was much better than A. This is not only in my taste, but in the smoke it produced and the burn.

    I have enjoyed this pass very much and thank Ashauler and everyone else for letting be part of it.

    I would think you know my answer but here it is:

    I would think by far, that B is the more expensive cigar.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    7,539
    Blog Entries
    56

    Default

    Very, very nice reviews.
    Here is what you smoked:
    A. Perdomo Fresco Torpedo: $1.53
    B. Rocky Patel Vintage 1999 Toro: $ 7.00

    Congratulations, you nailed it!!! Sig-tag on its way via PM, thanks for playing.

    Quote Originally Posted by CAJUNBLAZE View Post
    I decided on bag 11. Both we're light colored wrappers. One being a torpedo and the other more like a churchhill. Both 6 inches and around 50 ring gauge. Looking at them without bands, you would think it was the same cigar.

    Cigar A:

    This cigar felt a little soft around the center, a few veins, and light in color. I cut the cap and the pre light draw seemed fine, toasted the foot. It was a bit harder to light than other cigars. First draw seemed to have a little spice and sweet taste that only lasted about 5 minutes. That was replaced with a harsher earthy taste. The second third is were the problem started, it started getting very harsh and unpleasant. Then the wrapper started to unwrap!! After about 5 minutes the wrapper fell off! I had never had this happen before, it did expose a darker shade of tobacco underneath. I put it to rest shortly after that.

    Cigar B:

    This cigar felt as if had a better construction than A, it also had a few veins and light in color. The pre-light draw was better so I went ahead and toasted the foot. It lit well and burned even through the whole cigar. The firts third had subtle hints of earth and nuts. It put out alot of smoke and was a lot better that A. The burn still was close to perfect throughout the second third. The taste picked up more of the earthy tones but still a faint nutty taste. This lasted for the last third as well. I nubbed it. This was a very enjoyable cigar.

    Putting aside the wrapper issue and comparing even just the first third of both cigars, I would say B was much better than A. This is not only in my taste, but in the smoke it produced and the burn.

    I have enjoyed this pass very much and thank Ashauler and everyone else for letting be part of it.

    I would think you know my answer but here it is:

    I would think by far, that B is the more expensive cigar.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •