Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: New Tobacco Law

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    lunatic fringe
    Posts
    2,486

    Default Cigar cosmetics

    This raises some interesting questions. I searched "cigar additives", and one of the sites is a long list of things added to tobacco on its way to consumers. I'm thinking a lot of this is cigarette additives, but some are listed as exclusively for cigars. One is sodium nitrate, which is a combustion modifier for wrappers and binders in cigars (#67). So, wtf?

    The thing that comes to mind is a "razor sharp burn" that many use to market their product and that some expound upon in reviews. Now, I've had highly refined product (say, Casa Fuente) that sure enough had a line straight enough to plumb with. It kind of amazes me really how they're able to pull it off and I've always attributed this to superior skills of top rollers. Is this inaccurate? I've also smoked cigars that are not so refined (farmies from, well, I don't remember), although "unrefined" would be misleading. This would be like comparing bleached, fine, lotsa-shit-added cake flour to whole wheat. And, I'll take the latter over the former any time. As long as a cigar will draw, doesn't tunnel, and doesn't run too badly, I don't think I give a shit about a scalloped burn line.
    Equality is not seeing different things equally. It's seeing different things differently.
    - Tom Robbins

    - Like I needed you to tell me I'm a fucking prick . . . Did you think you're posting some front page news? I am a fucking prick . . . - MarineOne

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Bitterville
    Posts
    7,192
    Blog Entries
    117

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by basil View Post
    This raises some interesting questions. I searched "cigar additives", and one of the sites is a long list of things added to tobacco on its way to consumers. I'm thinking a lot of this is cigarette additives, but some are listed as exclusively for cigars. One is sodium nitrate, which is a combustion modifier for wrappers and binders in cigars (#67). So, wtf?

    The thing that comes to mind is a "razor sharp burn" that many use to market their product and that some expound upon in reviews. Now, I've had highly refined product (say, Casa Fuente) that sure enough had a line straight enough to plumb with. It kind of amazes me really how they're able to pull it off and I've always attributed this to superior skills of top rollers. Is this inaccurate? I've also smoked cigars that are not so refined (farmies from, well, I don't remember), although "unrefined" would be misleading. This would be like comparing bleached, fine, lotsa-shit-added cake flour to whole wheat. And, I'll take the latter over the former any time. As long as a cigar will draw, doesn't tunnel, and doesn't run too badly, I don't think I give a shit about a scalloped burn line.
    Agreed. I ususally comment on the burn in my reviews, but haven't had a "bummer" yet.

    Ted, do you know specifically of any brands that use KNO3 (Potassium Nitrate) to enhance the burn? I'd be interested in being able to identify when I'm not smoking something all natural.

    Will
    The powers that be might take it all away
    Together we burn, together we burn away

    Uncle Tupelo

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    lunatic fringe
    Posts
    2,486

    Default

    No, and really, that it is used as a "combustion modifier" is news to me, although not really surprising given how perfect some brands consistently burn. And, I'm not really sure this is what it's for. It could be for slower burn or to burn at the same rate as the filler or something, I don't know.

    I guess one of my points is, is that some rollers churn out their own product, surely without that aid and benefit of any number of modifiers, enhancers, and additives, to no ill effect. Are they as cosmetically compliant (I hesitate to use the word "appealing")? No, but it is, IMO, a superior product.
    Equality is not seeing different things equally. It's seeing different things differently.
    - Tom Robbins

    - Like I needed you to tell me I'm a fucking prick . . . Did you think you're posting some front page news? I am a fucking prick . . . - MarineOne

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    7,539
    Blog Entries
    56

    Default

    Very interesting Ted, thanks for the post. Perhaps the new regs, while onerous on the surface, may provide some kind of benefit. Other than infused cigars, and dyed wrappers, I was ignorant of chemical modifications to cigar tobacco.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Some Chair in Greensburg, Pa
    Posts
    1,420

    Default

    I thought cigar tobacco was pure and untouched by chemicals as well. Should be interesting to see where this goes.
    Yay! Cigars!


  6. #6

    Default

    I think what concerns me more than additives for flavor enhancement or dyes for color would be insecticides. As we all know, little holes in the wrapper are a big problem. Some of the small tobacco farms are hidden away in places where... who would know? A little DDT goes a long way to killing bugs.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    lunatic fringe
    Posts
    2,486

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by craig View Post
    One has to keep in mind that "cigar" in the link Basil posted includes machine-made cigars, "little cigars," cigars with binder and/or wrapper made of "homogenized tobacco product" (paper with made from stems, etc.), filler that might include reconstituted tobacco, White Owls , etc.

    Anyhow, the truth is out there somewhere ...
    Good point. I don't think about that stuff as cigars.

    Quote Originally Posted by DeeDubya View Post
    I think what concerns me more than additives for flavor enhancement or dyes for color would be insecticides. As we all know, little holes in the wrapper are a big problem. Some of the small tobacco farms are hidden away in places where... who would know? A little DDT goes a long way to killing bugs.
    Yeah, I've wondered about this as well. You can bet that regs are either unenforced or nonexistent in other (3rd world) countries. And if using pesticides=higher yields=larger profit margins, then, well, that all equals pesticide use.

    I know, I get geniuser every day.
    Equality is not seeing different things equally. It's seeing different things differently.
    - Tom Robbins

    - Like I needed you to tell me I'm a fucking prick . . . Did you think you're posting some front page news? I am a fucking prick . . . - MarineOne

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    1,786
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    One has to keep in mind that "cigar" in the link Basil posted includes machine-made cigars, "little cigars," cigars with binder and/or wrapper made of "homogenized tobacco product" (paper with made from stems, etc.), filler that might include reconstituted tobacco, White Owls , etc.

    Anyhow, the truth is out there somewhere ...
    Craig
    Ahhhhhhhhhhh Cigar Jesus just wept - kevin7
    A cigar storage primer | Basic Cuban cigar info

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •