Originally Posted by ggiese
It's in blodik's apology thread. I'm not going to look it up because I have better things to do. You find it. An absolute shame that he was so forgiving of this guy. It makes me wonder.![]()
Originally Posted by ggiese
It's in blodik's apology thread. I'm not going to look it up because I have better things to do. You find it. An absolute shame that he was so forgiving of this guy. It makes me wonder.![]()
Originally Posted by SFG75
Read what I said, Alfred - Quote it or post a retraction...
If my post in the apology thread is "defending" blodick, then so is CC's post. Simple as that Boy-George.Originally Posted by ggiese
Oh, and how is the "culture club"???![]()
You're not walking away from your CC defending Oblik post without further explanation - and keep this in mind - I won't let this go. You know I won't - you've seen some of your other devious work continually come back to haunt you. Your silence in this matter will speak volumes of who you are... I promise you, Alfred - I'll follow you all over this board until you answer this post.
You have ONLY Two choices, Alfred:
A) Find the CC defending Oblik posts you speak of and post it - OR -
B) Post a FULL retraction to this post
Don't ignore me on this - you WILL face the music if you do, Alfred...
Originally Posted by ggiese
I owe you nothing. CC stated that my post on the apology thread was "defending" Oblik. If that is the case.........Of course, you don't address that because CC's use of that post(which I pointed out was made countless times) is a nugatory point. Keep going Boy George. And tell the "culture club" hi for me.![]()
LMAO "makes you wonder" no one is going to believe you on that one Scroto, not even yourself, so why post garbage like that? That's like saying "Well, you know, the sun JUST MAY NOT come up tomorrow...." I laid out and explained the whole deal in my previous lenghty post and you simply cannot refute the logic to you resort to Scroto-tactics, ignore, deflect and insult when you've completely lost the argument or debate.Originally Posted by SFG75
Here's what has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt:
1. You are a dork
2. You came here to support Blodick and start trouble with those who were raking him over the coals
And your continued rantings and BS only lead us to draw further conclusions:
1. You have the maturity level of one of your junior high school students.
What's with this "Boy George" baby talk?It's laughable, and actually, I'm embarrassed for you. I hope you little feelings aren't hurt because ggiese has been refereing to you as "Alfred" I honestly thought you'd like that since you're using a dopey picture of Alfred E. Newman as your avatar.
TBSCigars - "On Holiday"
Grammar - It's the difference between knowing your crap and knowing you're crap.
#2 is a presumption that I most resent. In all of my posts, I have never made reference to him. Yes, I made some comments in the apology thread, as well as you have. To post my comments on that thread as evidence that I came here to defend him is silly. Other than that post(which I've mentioned in previous arguments-as you well know since you haven't posted any of them as evidence for you) there isn't one post where I defend him against anyone.Originally Posted by CoventryCat86
As for starting trouble on the board, let's get some things straight.
1.)The site admin started a thread about you, not me, starting trouble here
2.)It is because of you that a thread titled "Why are we fighting?" was created BEFORE I got here.
3.)You posted harassing comments thirteen times after my on-topic posts of which I let slide.
Judging from these actions-It is you and your friends who are the "trolls" here. I may be a "leg-humper" in your eyes, but I'm not a nattering-nabob-of-negativity as you and Boy George are.![]()
Scroto, you can resent it all you want but it's the TRUTH and you know it. Do you deny that Blodick was crying on your shoulder over on the Island and that you offered him words of support? Again, don't lie here because there are too many witnessesOriginally Posted by SFG75
You probably think that since we can't prove this with posts (your little buddy Zac claims to have lost all the posts) that means you can lie about it and get away with it. Well ya can't so please do yourself a favor and stop insisting that you didn't come over here to support your buddy Blodick who was in the middle of a well deserved beat down.
Again, as you've been instructed, if you want to talk about others starting trouble on the board, START YOUR OWN THREAD. For about the sixth time, this thread is about YOU and that fact that you are a dork. If you want to try and make some case about how I'm some kind of trouble maker here, I would welcome the opportunity to discuss this. You just go right ahead and start a thread about that and see what happens.![]()
Now getting back on topic (since you have once again employed Scroto-tactics here) the case has been proven beyond a reasonalbe doubt that:
1. You are a dork
2. You came here to support and "back up" your buddy Blodick and he made a fool out of you, didn't he?
You can try and paint me as some "trouble maker" and go right ahead because if my "trouble making" has cleared this place of phoney scammers like Blodick and heavy handed, cocky blowhards like CockyHooskins then I'll be more that happy for you and anyone else to call me anything you want.
TBSCigars - "On Holiday"
Grammar - It's the difference between knowing your crap and knowing you're crap.
"Words of support" are exactly what we both gave him when he apologized. He posted an apology at LTC and I reiterated the comments that I posted here. There is nothing wrong with that(as you did it as well, remember?) If any member of LTC says that I was asked to join CSmokers in order to defend him, and that is the only reason why I'm here-I'm flat out calling them a liar. I would also appreciate it if the lying party would be so kind as to say when I posted something along the lines of: "That's it!, I'm headed over there and hell's coming with me!." I joined this board to talk about cigars and to just avoid you as best I can.Originally Posted by CoventryCat86
I don't know whats going and this SFG 75 guy doesnt seem that bad as everyone is making him out to be but why on Earth is he still here if it seems like no body wants him here?
Just a thought......I prefer to stay neutral.....
Jens
OK...just one more thing....I'd like to remain neutral but this is really starting to get annoying. Almost any where there is a post by this guy, there is one by CoventryCat86 or ggiese that just rips this guy to shreds. Can we maintain civility here?
I think everyone should just grow up about this....at least in the non-politics section....
What is this, delayed reaction stupidity? What changed from yesterday to today with respect to me?Originally Posted by gtxjet
TBSCigars - "On Holiday"
Grammar - It's the difference between knowing your crap and knowing you're crap.
Starting to get annoying to you?? Oh, I'm sorry - did you say something???Originally Posted by gtxjet
Calm down there Francis. We are maintaining civility (except here). You don't know the story - you're new - do some research. I don't think you should be running around ripping on me and CC unless you know all the facts. You're NOT remaining neutral....
A few suggestions!Originally Posted by gtxjet
![]()
1.) There is an "ignore" function for members on this forum that you can use to block the posts of any member you choose. But CC and Ggeise are two of the more knowledgeable and experienced members on this site IMHO, so you would miss out on a lot of potentially great information!
2.) If you can't stomach the dynamics of this forum , you might want to consider joining up at CigarWeekly.com instead. They have a "no flaming" / heavy moderating / "group hug"approach that may better suit your personality. But again , IMHO Hex runs a great site here and I think you would miss out on a lot!
/ Hugh![]()
Last edited by Hugh Jorgan; 07-13-2005 at 07:38 PM.
`
`
Disclaimer: All views made on The Hugh Jorgan Show ® are the opinion of Hugh Jorgan Productions, Inc. ® and do not reflect the views of our sponsors.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks