War after war, whether is new one? HISTORY REPEATS

[Oleg281]

Terrorists who attacked London and terrorists which work under covering of London in their countries - are people with different points of view.
Terrorists who are supported by London are armed democrats in their native land, they are helpers to
London in it's democratic colonization, a treacherous column. London supports dissidents specially
to destroy other states and colonize them.
These invited democrats regret about happened attacks to London directed
against democratic colonization of developing countries and the countries of the third world.

[Iced T]

[Oleg281]

Rigid administrative selection of persons who define a policy of the state, and ideas discussed in a society. For realization of these problems the society and its citizens are controled.
In a totalitarian society there can not be equal rights for citizens, that we can see on an example of structure of authority in England.

Ideology of terrorism is the anticolonialism.
Against what ideology English government struggles?
And what ideology advances?
May be colonialism? Iraq?

[samclemmons]

This guy spams a million boards with this nonsense. Google oleg281 and you can see 'em all.

[Iced T]

Oleg, what is your personal stake in getting us to agree with you? Or are you just trying to "inform us?"

[Oleg281]

I think, that the terrorism in England is connected with occupation of Iraq,
and London does not wish to disengage armies because it is possible to get
a loss of profit for the English companies in Iraq.
Whether war will have been thrown to the territory of England?

[reaganyouth84]

I think, that the terrorism in England is connected with occupation of Iraq,
and London does not wish to disengage armies because it is possible to get
a loss of profit for the English companies in Iraq.
Whether war will have been thrown to the territory of England?

Terrorists were doing suicide bombings in countries looooooooooong before the Iraq war.
-Mike

[Kenyth]

A propaganda robot. He probably doesn't even read replies. The electronic equivalent of dropping flyers. A real good one too! Lots of big words and no logic!



Hey, ass ! Here's a message for YOU!


and !



Your useless prattle makes as much sense as a soup sandwich!

[labmonkey]

This guy spams a million boards with this nonsense. Google oleg281 and you can see 'em all.

sounds like a good enough reason for a banning to me...

[Drake]

damn, you're right about the google thing. i agree with labemonkey. he's not even making any solid arguements. get him out of here.

[samclemmons]

sounds like a good enough reason for a banning to me...

Yeah, I thought so too. Then I pm'd Hecks abut this pos and he ignored it. No reply, no action. Good enough reason for me not to hang around here.

NA

[Oleg281]

With falling of English ideology of military colonization in Germany (in 1945) and with growth of national-liberation movements, distribution of ideology of democratic colonization had become an answer to the challenge of the epoch. U.Cherchill was the founder of the international development of idea. The essence of the idea consisted in creation of democratic elections on the basis of interests of colonialists. Financial resources and the advanced political technologies provided visibility of the democratic elections and a victory of representatives of colonialists. Now the erroneousness of Cherchill's idea as a tool for suppression of anticolonialism is obvious on an example of civil and emancipating wars in Iraq. But the English government won't be able to put U.Cherchill to prison, he has died.

[Kenyth]

He talks, but all I hear is Beaker from the Muppets..........


I keep forgetting that sites don't like having their images linked to other sites.


Mememeep.......Mememememememeep........Memeep!

[8-5-8]

C'mon... the dude has 13 posts and they're all in this fucking thread... seems he has alot to add to out CIGAR community, eh?

[Oleg281]

Englishmen have been put into frameworks of support of a struggle of colonialists,
it is also democracy. It is the democracy refined from reality.
The government of colonialists spreads nazism in a society,
having delegated to the England the maximum right - to define destiny of people.

In front of London there is a question: system democracy for the sake of safety
in the interests of colonialists, or freedom in the interests of people and releasing
occupied countries from democratic colonization.

US government reflects with an interest
about what will be in London, the center of world ideology?
In fact if London fall, it will be necessary to change the policy.

[joshua]

Hey oleg, ever smoke a cigar?

[wam79]

Can't say much about what he says...
I put the POS on ignore my first day here

Bill

[cigarsarge]

Time for someone to take a flying leap. Oleg281

[Oleg281]

England which made so much for nazism, has remained out of work after occupation of the Europe by nazis. Hitler not only ignored interests of England but also “put to the place” his neighbour. To Hitler it was enough, and further - to the East.
There was no second front. The England-American front was urgently opened and question about repartition of the Europe was rised then.

Hitler’s policy was based on
political views of London in many respects. Hitler headed a policy of colonization.
So " the policy of pacification" actually was a policy of the consent with
Hitler's actions, but it was replaced by policy of treachery to Hitler after, though
ideological views of London have not changed.

Iraq (2002) was disarmed and was ready to cooperate with the United Nations, S.Husejn was deceived, now terrorists protect the country from democratic colonialists.

[Oleg281]

1. The economy of Germany after defeat in the First World war was completely under the control of the English capital (reparation, credits).
By 1932 Englishmen did not know what is more favourably for England - credits or reparations, and democratic elections passed under the control of the English capital.
2. Hitler has won democratic elections owing to support of London.
Money come also directly from abroad: English oil king Deterding, a friend of Hoffmann and Rehberg, supplied Hitler with currency on a regular basis (he gave 10 million of dutch guldens once).
3 England never consider seriously to Hitler. Hitler was a hope as a force which is capable to control people.
4 When war began? Was Czechoslovakia occupied after partition of Poland? England initiated war.
5 Hitler was not going to occupy England. Hitler understood, that England is the leading colonial power, and England understood that there must be no friends in war for colonies.
Military actions against England had inconsistent character.
Luftvaffe never undertook concentrated attacks to the British radar stations, and they had huge value for defense of the country. Hitler counted, that having transferred bombardments on cities of England he will compel London to go for negotiations. Negotiations about what?
6. The second front was conducted in Africa in trying to solve colonial problems.
Only people's liberation movements and USSR battled against colonialism. For England the main thing was preservation of owned colonies and repartition of the Europe.
7. 60 million person was lost because of a colonial policy of England which come to deadlock.