It was a while ago, so 1)i'm not quite sure where they came from, maybe CI? And 2) maybe the issues have resolved by now.
They were churchills
It was a while ago, so 1)i'm not quite sure where they came from, maybe CI? And 2) maybe the issues have resolved by now.
They were churchills
The powers that be might take it all away
Together we burn, together we burn away
Uncle Tupelo
I bought a few of these (a fiver I think) when I first heard about them. I was disappointed in them to be honest and it took me probably 3 years to smoke them all and I think I might have even given two away.
Bearing in mind that taste is subjective, I didn't care for them and wouldn't buy them again.
It matters not how strait the gate,
How charged with punishments the scroll.
I am the master of my fate:
I am the captain of my soul.
***William Ernest Henley***
Hmmmmm.................
I know they were advertised as full bodied cigars and are actually more of a medium in most opinions, mine included. Full lovers may be disappointed due to that alone. Mediums and medium-fulls tend to be my favorites. There is also the fact that tobacco, like any other produce, has both good and bad years. I'm guessing blends are also tweaked as time goes on based on learning curve and leaf availability. Consistency is always a problem with cigars it seems. I guess I'll have to take my chances. I'd feel better if there was a another positive experience here though.
Thank you for your feedback.
Last edited by Kenyth; 08-11-2016 at 11:57 AM.
"some people are like slinkies, they're not really good for anything but they can bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs." –Unknown
"He did for bullshit what Stonehenge did for rocks." -Cecil Adams
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks