Thanks for the information guys....
I also found a good FAQ from the man himself on CP:
http://www.cigarpass.com/forums/inde...11600&hl=beads
Thanks for the information guys....
I also found a good FAQ from the man himself on CP:
http://www.cigarpass.com/forums/inde...11600&hl=beads
Also, I wouldn't expect absolutely rock-stable humidification with ANY system. I have the 70% beads, and I noticed that the humidity runs a little high after I moisten them, and a little low (even though many are still clear) when I need to moisten them.
Yet, it is the most fool-proof system I've seen.
Also, it seems the more beads you use, the greater stability you can achieve. You can't use too many.
"There are five things, above all else, that make life worth living: a good relationship with God, a good woman, good health, good friends, and a good cigar. " -Prince Sined Yar Maharg
I have heard that propylene glycol can alter the taste of a cigar. I do not know, because I have never used the stuff. I use the beads and would not want to use anything else. PG is a fungicide, and fungal cells are similar to human cells. I have read over the internet that PG is an irritant for humans. So I don't use that stuff.
Originally Posted by cls515
I think you might be getting Propylene Glycol and Ethylene Glycol mixed up. PG is in all sorts of stuff, toothpaste, deoderant, food coloring etc. Where as Ethylene can screw up your blood filitering organs and nervous system.
Trust me...65% beads are the only way to go. They are stable and just need refreshing every month or so.![]()
Thanks fellas...my order has been placed for the 65% beads. Hopefully they'll go out today...really looking forward to having a MUCH more painless setup and to see the difference with my cigars when they stabilize in the 65% environment.
![]()
NH, ethylene and propylene glycol are similar. PG is "generally regarded as safe". More PG is needed to show the effects ethylene glycol show at lower concentrations. Either way, I'll stear clear.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks