Results 1 to 20 of 300

Thread: Review These - Reviews

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Tracy CA...South of Sac
    Posts
    572

    Default I smoked it!!!

    Here is Stick # 1 of my review...I smoked it this weakend and my review is coming...Hang in there
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	tn.jpg 
Views:	252 
Size:	2.0 KB 
ID:	670  

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Tracy CA...South of Sac
    Posts
    572

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maduro Man View Post
    Here is Stick # 1 of my review...I smoked it this weakend and my review is coming...Hang in there

    Ok Guys here is the review of stick #1. Let me start by saying, WHAT A GREAT AND ENJOYABLE SMOKE!!! From start to finish I really enjoyed this stick! This was a square pressed maduro. Before toasting it, I took this one in. It smelled sweet and fresh. I nubbed on this one for about10 mins before I lit it. It lit well and burned evenly from start to finish. I was amazed to see the ash was a dark gray. I find that usually with a cigar that burns this well the ash will be a bright white color. I was able to get some length from it before I tapped it for the first time. Every draw was a delight! This one started and finished mild. The flavor was full bodied but not overpowering. I smoked this one down to the point I was burning my fingers. The smoke that was produced from start to finish was thick and white. The bouquet this stick was giving off was also very enjoyable. My wife even made a comment about it and asked what I was smoking. My answer was, “I don’t know…But I LIKE IT A LOT.

    Next stick will be reviewed in the days to come.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Here and there.
    Posts
    973

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maduro Man View Post
    Ok Guys here is the review of stick #1. Let me start by saying, WHAT A GREAT AND ENJOYABLE SMOKE!!! From start to finish I really enjoyed this stick! This was a square pressed maduro. Before toasting it, I took this one in. It smelled sweet and fresh. I nubbed on this one for about10 mins before I lit it. It lit well and burned evenly from start to finish. I was amazed to see the ash was a dark gray. I find that usually with a cigar that burns this well the ash will be a bright white color. I was able to get some length from it before I tapped it for the first time. Every draw was a delight! This one started and finished mild. The flavor was full bodied but not overpowering. I smoked this one down to the point I was burning my fingers. The smoke that was produced from start to finish was thick and white. The bouquet this stick was giving off was also very enjoyable. My wife even made a comment about it and asked what I was smoking. My answer was, “I don’t know…But I LIKE IT A LOT.

    Next stick will be reviewed in the days to come.
    Do I smell...........yet another SP DM?

    Or possibly an RP OWR...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Tracy CA...South of Sac
    Posts
    572

    Default Don't Tell Anyone

    Hey there fellows, SHHH Dont tell anyone but Sancho Panza was going to be my first guess. That or a Santa Clara Havana Reserve...I'll give my input when I post stick #2s review.
    Last edited by Maduro Man; 09-21-2007 at 02:07 AM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Tracy CA...South of Sac
    Posts
    572

    Talking Review of sticks from BDURRANI

    Ok…Review # 2 of the sticks I got from BDurrani. Well I should start by saying, stick #2 was a let down after having #1. Stick #2 was very squishy to the touch and had a bitter smell to it. After lighting this the first few draws were nice and mild. It burned uneven through out the smoke; this aspect was forcing me to tap the ash a lot more then I wanted to. Half way through the taste turned to a bitter sour and progressively became more and more harsh. I can tell when I’m not going to like a stick when it makes me want to spit after every draw. I was a spitting fool with this one… I had a hard time keeping this one lit. If there is one good thing I can say about this stick, I would say I really enjoyed the bouquet she gave off but that’s about it.

    My feelings are that #1 is the more expensive smoke. Its construction and taste were far more superior to that of #2. I’m even going to go out on a limb here and say that I think #1 is a Sancho Panza or Santa Clara Havana Reserve. # 2 tasted like a Mexican stick.

    Lastley I wanted to thank BDurrani for giving me this opportunity. Also thanks for your time in getting these sticks out to me.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	tn.jpg 
Views:	294 
Size:	3.4 KB 
ID:	673  

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maduro Man View Post
    Ok…Review # 2 of the sticks I got from BDurrani. Well I should start by saying, stick #2 was a let down after having #1. Stick #2 was very squishy to the touch and had a bitter smell to it. After lighting this the first few draws were nice and mild. It burned uneven through out the smoke; this aspect was forcing me to tap the ash a lot more then I wanted to. Half way through the taste turned to a bitter sour and progressively became more and more harsh. I can tell when I’m not going to like a stick when it makes me want to spit after every draw. I was a spitting fool with this one… I had a hard time keeping this one lit. If there is one good thing I can say about this stick, I would say I really enjoyed the bouquet she gave off but that’s about it.

    My feelings are that #1 is the more expensive smoke. Its construction and taste were far more superior to that of #2. I’m even going to go out on a limb here and say that I think #1 is a Sancho Panza or Santa Clara Havana Reserve. # 2 tasted like a Mexican stick.

    Lastley I wanted to thank BDurrani for giving me this opportunity. Also thanks for your time in getting these sticks out to me.
    Any time.

    As for your guesses, you are correct. Cigar #1 is more expensive, but isn't a Sancho Panza or Santa Clara (never had either of them). Good job on the reviews.

    Cigar #1 - Rocky Patel Vintage 1990 - $7.00
    Cigar #2 - Perdomo Sumatra - $3.00

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    19 58.7N 75 49.4W
    Posts
    1,893

    Default Review These from mithril

    Cigar #1

    Pre-smoke
    The first cigar had what looked to be a colorado or natural wrapper with a few small veins. Good construction with a consistantly firm feel to it. It had a small crack in the wrapper about 1/2 from the cap and some other small cracks at the foot. None of the cracks became a problem. Smelling the wrapper, I got hints of wet grass or hay. The prelight flavor was sweet tobacco and the draw was good.

    Smoke
    Paired with a couple of Michelob Amber Bock beers.
    The cigar cut and lit with no problems. It started off mild - medium bodied and pretty much stayed there. Flavor wise, it was enjoyable. I picked up hints of what I think may have been hickory when I exhaled through my nose. The most dominant flavor was just tobacco and hay. The draw remained good throughout the cigar. It had a good burn and held a nice light gray ash. I put it out about 2/3 of way. The burn was beginning to be a problem and it was getting a little bitter. Overall about a 6/10, good cigar depending on the price.

    Cigar #2

    Pre-smoke
    The second cigar had an almost a claro or very light natural shade wrapper that was very thin. The construction was good with no noticable damage. The cigar had a very firm feel to it. The smell of the wrapper was of sweet tobacco. The prelight flavor was grassy/hay with a good draw.

    Smoke
    Paired with a glass of iced tea.
    The cigar cut and lit with no problems. I would say this was mild - medium and occasionally medium bodied when exhaled through the nose. The flavor wasn't very complex, mainly just good sweet tobacco and hay with a hint of spice. The burn was good and it held about an inch and a half on a windy day. Overall it was about 6/10, also a good cigar depending on the price.

    Comparison

    It's hard to say which one of these is the more expensive cigar. My gut tells me to go with #2 as the more expensive of the two. Cigar #2's flavor profile reminded me of a Casa Torano. I cant put my finger on #1, the hickory/woodsy flavor has me stumped. I enjoyed them both about the same, nothing spectacular but decent smokes.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •