I figured that they would be suffering from blemishes and burn problems , but would still taste the same . Thanks for the review , now I won't waste my money .![]()
I figured that they would be suffering from blemishes and burn problems , but would still taste the same . Thanks for the review , now I won't waste my money .![]()
It could be that I had different batches of leaf between the two. That may account for the difference. The fact remains that the regulars had a noticably lighter wrapper and tasted better to me.
I forgot I even had these. I had gotten so many cigars at the same time that they got shuffled to the bottom. I only smoked one, so I have 4 left. I will have to dig them out!!
I have bought two seconds bundles from the 1990 version and never had a burn problem, and the visual problems with the sticks are very minimum. 20 bucks for a bundle is nice too.
Originally Posted by cameroncouch02
Have you compared them side by side to the regulars? How did they compare in your opinion? It's not a big burn problem so much as I noticed the regulars just burn better.
$20 a bundle of 15? Wow!
Where?
Cigarbid.comOriginally Posted by Kenyth
Sometimes you get lucky and sometimes you dont. My petit corona's look pretty good. I gave basil one, so you should ask him how it smoked. For seconds and the price they are hard to beat IMO.
This is a good cigar - not much experience really with RP - but the PC I got from CC02 was nice.
Equality is not seeing different things equally. It's seeing different things differently.
- Tom Robbins
- Like I needed you to tell me I'm a fucking prick . . . Did you think you're posting some front page news? I am a fucking prick . . . - MarineOne
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks