Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Cohiba Ownership

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    P.O. Box 14403 Tallahassee, FL 32317
    Posts
    1,906
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    I personally applaud this decision. Cohiba was a trademark established after the revolution by Fidel Castro and his cronies. IMHO trademarks established my dictatorships should hold no weight in the international community.

    My grandfather owned a huge factory in Cuba prior to the revolution. He lost everything he had and had to start over here. Will the property my family owned be returned to us when Castro dies? I doubt it.

    Last edited by hex1848; 03-11-2005 at 07:16 AM.

  2. #2

    Default

    hex, as I said, I am not discounting the history of how the Cuban government got their ownership. I just think from a trademark (as opposed to copyright) law standpoint, it is a potentially bad decision.

    You are right about Cohiba though. It is a label created by Castro after the embargo. It may be a good decision there (which is probably why General Cigar used that label in this case). However, what about H. Upmann, Montecristo, RyJ, Bolivar, and so on.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •