Santa Damiana

[Kenyth]

I smoked another Santa Damiana. This one was a tubo. I had high hopes from my experience with the last one. When I first looked at it, it looked strange. The wrapper was covered in tiny black dots and was significantly darker than the last one I had. It was also rolled looser and had no sheen at all. If it didn't have the band, I'd have sworn it was a completely different cigar.

IT SUCKED! No complexity, no sweetness, and it had a cheap somewhat harsh tobacco flavor. I suffered through it for a while and ditched it less than halfway through.

I am just confused as hell how there can be such a difference between two smokes like that! Maybe the name was bought out and rolled by someone different? I don't know. You can't seem to find these anymore anyway, so I guess it's a moot point.

[thepyrofish]

Maybe not all Santa Damiana cigars are the rebanded ones. When they needed to be rebanded they could have just chosen another name they make. All rebanded Monti's are SD, but not all SD are rebanded Monti's? Not fact, just an idea. That would explain them appearing to be different cigars altogether. They essentially would be.

[varmas]

Hey...

I had a Santa Damiana Rothchild H2000 last night. It's a Pajero, Robusto size if I'm correct.

It was grate. Just grate. It gave me a little ashy, not pleasent smoke when lit, but after few draws it got better - way better. The Draw was good, the burn - evin. It had somewhat a coffe flavour. The middle was the best part of it. Smoke was warm, but not hot, so the taste was good, not burning or ashy - cofffe, maybe evin nutts. And smell was nice - fresh smoke a little sweat evin. The end got hot, but what surprised me - not ashy. Coffe (and probably all subtile tastes) was gone and smoke got strong, earthy, but I still liked it. Smoked it for more than an hour.

I'll sure be smokin' some more of those

No info on tabacconist's words tho...:/