Ashton Cabinet Series SGV(again)

[Oblik]

To the people who posted here about anything other than the review(which was all of them), the posts were deleted only because you have already taken over the first one...keep it at that. This is for the members who do not care to take part in our little problem.

IF there are any more of such posts in this thread they will be deleted. Please try to understand...

[alexgtp]

Hey my post was deleted. And I was actually commenting on what a great cigar this was..



VSG?

Vsg is a great cigar very well constructed and very good taste. I just wish they were better priced.

Now if I could only find a spellbound...because that is the only VSG i have not tried.. Well besides the infamous ER!!

[Oblik]

Sorry Alex

[Oblik]

If you are not responding to the review please take it into the other thread.

[CoventryCat86]

Well first off, there is no such Ashton VSG called a "Lonsdale" nor any size of Ashton VSG that is 6 1/2 x 42. Are you sure you weren't smoking another fake?

Now, before you lose your mind and blow up at me THAT WAS JUST A JOKE, get it a JOKE

You were probably smoking an Illusion whose dimensions are 6 1/2 x 44 and your price of $8.50 is right on the money.

The wrappers of these cigars are NOT maduro, they are wrapped with a "sun grown" Ecuadorian wrapper that is not a maduro wrapper at all. They are very different from one another.

These are not anywhere near as strong as an Opus X.

Glad you liked it but I've never been a fan of Ashton VSGs

they have the same look as an Opus in the since that they look rough.

Oh yeah, "sense" not "since", that error has nothing to do with typing fast and everything to do with not knowing proper word useage Even a spell checker or a thesaurus check wouldn't pick that up so you're going to have to drop back to good ole brain power which is a good habit to get into.

[Oblik]

Thank you for the krateque(SP LOL) ...I'm just kidding Cat...

You are right, they are not Maduro, Maduro is usualy my choice BUT this one jumped out at me(I guess I needed a ",")