Ok time for a major update w/ pics even!
Here is the picture of the damaged #9
http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/3223/dscf3836ih8.jpg
The hopeful miracle worker!
http://img226.imageshack.us/img226/3729/dscf3848vs8.jpg
Surgery table prepped.
http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/6931/dscf3851po6.jpg
Surgery complete
http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/3725/dscf3853ub0.jpg
Resting in the ICU
http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/2458/dscf3861mn9.jpg
Results after 30mins of rehab.
http://img245.imageshack.us/img245/9665/dscf3867ej5.jpg
http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/275/dscf3870yn7.jpg
Here is a pic of the damaged "hinges" on the main container.
http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/466/dscf3844um6.jpg
And because of the size of the containers and the box they have to rest in the box on their sides.
http://img181.imageshack.us/img181/5952/dscf3845av1.jpg
So after an excursion to Wally World I came back with two options.
Option #1 are just about the same size as the current containers but quite a bit sturdier.
Option #1 Pic #1
Option #1 Pic #2
Option #1 Pic #3
Option #2 appears to hold about the same about as 2 of the Option #1's, but Option #2 was a hell of alot studier. I stood on Option #2 with both feet and it barely flexed! I'm 6'6" & 280lbs. The only problem with Option #2 is that it isn't air tight like Option #1 is. But I have some foam weatherstripping that is supposed prevent humidity loss that I can put around the lip of the container.
Option #2 Pic #1
Option #2 Pic #2
If we go with Option #1 I will get a different/bigger box because it is a tight, tight fit with both of them in there. If we go with Option #2 the current box will work fine.
Thoughts and opinons?
Last edited by HarvInSTL; 10-03-2006 at 04:41 AM.
Reason: Fixed pictures
The very existence of flame-throwers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done." -George Carlin
Bookmarks