Results 1 to 20 of 39

Thread: Go, Willie!

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    P.O. Box 14403 Tallahassee, FL 32317
    Posts
    1,906
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    This link popped up in a thread over at Metafilter about this:

    http://talkleft.com/new_archives/015767.html

    Enforcing marijuana prohibition costs taxpayers between $10 billion and $12 billion annually and has led to the arrest of nearly 18 million Americans. Nevertheless, some 94 million Americans acknowledge having used marijuana during their lives. It makes no sense to continue to treat nearly half of all Americans as criminals for their use of a substance that poses no greater - and arguably far fewer - health risks than alcohol or tobacco.
    Its hard to disagree.

    I know this issue is off topic for this site, but it's something that has been on my mind for quite some time. I'm not sure what can be done to change these laws, but imprisoning non violent drug users does nothing to help society (unless you count the $$ going to lawyers and law enforcement).

    I know I would much rather have my tax money going to preventing things like 9/11 then keeping the next door neighbors 19 year old son in jail for 6 months for having a couple onces of weed on him at a traffic stop.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    19 58.7N 75 49.4W
    Posts
    1,893

    Default

    Forget about the weed(damn random drug tests) I'll take the shrooms.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Westminster, CO
    Posts
    2,067

    Default On Letterman last night

    ...they found a pound and a half of marijuana on willie's tour bus... Willie's cutting back.


    ...they found mushrooms on the bus. Willie's really worried about this. He's afraid he's going to have to spend the rest of 1969 in jail.

  4. #4

    Default

    I wrote Willie a letter one time. Cool thing about was he wrote me back.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,935

    Default

    I agree with Ben Stein on this one. Just like our government should help to curb the sale of anti-depressants and ridilin which are being sold like tic-tacs, we should never legalize any narcotic. Why, because our society already spends too much time avoiding real life and real issues by trying to smoke or drink them away. Now, why not prohibit beer then, since it is used for the same purpose?

    Well, if all there were in our country were Anheiser and Miller, then I'd say fine, prohibit it, I can get just as much beer from my toilet or hose out back. But, because there are true culinarily great beers that serve a wonderful culinary purpose, much like wines, I say alcohol stays. (Though we should look in to making water-beer illegal )

    Seriously though, our country uses TV and so many other things to avoid our own reality and problems (why do you think we want to know so bad when celebrities eat lunch or have babies, stuff we do everyday?), that making narcotics legal will only intensify this problem. Our world isn't getting any better and the solution isn't to smoke, shoot, snort the problem away, it's to wake up from our drug induced (pfizer or good ole' maui wowie) slumber and start facing reality and working on a solution.

    I used to be for pot legalization, imagine the tax revenue, etc... But, Ben is right.
    "If you look for truth, you may find comfort in the end; if you look for comfort you will not get either comfort or truth only soft soap and wishful thinking to begin, and in the end, despair." -C.S. Lewis, Mere Christianity

  6. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hex1848 View Post
    I know this issue is off topic for this site, but it's something that has been on my mind for quite some time. I'm not sure what can be done to change these laws, but imprisoning non violent drug users does nothing to help society (unless you count the $$ going to lawyers and law enforcement).
    In a similar vein, I've become annoyed with every state creeping its legal blood alcohol level lower and lower and lower. I'm much less concerned about the guy that had 2 drinks on his way home from work... I'm concerned about the guy driving down the wrong side of the sidewalk.

    It seems we're so obsessed with "getting tough on ____" that we fail to apply logic...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    153 Whitney Way Cibolo, TX 78108
    Posts
    762

    Default

    He should have told them it was just for the Bio-Diesel on his bus.
    End of line.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    lunatic fringe
    Posts
    2,486

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SuperChuck View Post
    In a similar vein, I've become annoyed with every state creeping its legal blood alcohol level lower and lower and lower. I'm much less concerned about the guy that had 2 drinks on his way home from work... I'm concerned about the guy driving down the wrong side of the sidewalk.

    It seems we're so obsessed with "getting tough on ____" that we fail to apply logic...
    Dude, logic holds that the difference between 2 drinks (the universal answer to any policeman's inquiry) and driving down either side of the sidewalk DOES NOT EXIST WITHOUT THOSE FIRST TWO DRINKS HAVING BEEN CONSUMED FIRST. Hopefully, they'll creep the BAC all the way down to Zero Tolerance. Right now, people drinking and driving are wiping out more lives than all the other drivers under the influence of all the other drugs combined. Rarely, if ever, is anyone stopped and cited for DUI/DWI after 2 drinks (unless s/he is a minor, for whom zero tolerance laws do exist. In Texas, anything detectable [even the smell] may warrant a DUI, which is a class C misdemeanor. At the officer's discretion, they may demand sobriety tests, and cite for DWI, the more serious offense). It just does not happen. Those who say it has happened to them are lying/in denial.

    Quote Originally Posted by WhiteWidow View Post
    He should have told them it was just for the Bio-Diesel on his bus.
    Good one.
    Last edited by basil; 09-29-2006 at 11:15 AM.
    Equality is not seeing different things equally. It's seeing different things differently.
    - Tom Robbins

    - Like I needed you to tell me I'm a fucking prick . . . Did you think you're posting some front page news? I am a fucking prick . . . - MarineOne

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by basil View Post
    Right now, people drinking and driving are wiping out more lives than all the other drivers under the influence of all the other drugs combined.
    This is a problem. However, accessibility must be considered. Sure other things are readily available, but many won't take the chance because of legal issues....yet they'll drive intoxicated. Go figure.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Havana, Cuba
    Posts
    2,339

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by designwise1 View Post
    While we are on (kinda) this subject... why is it more illegal to smoke an ISOM than a jo!nt? I mean, is someone has a pipe big enough to hold an island.... they should be allowed to smoke it.

    Ok. That was just stupid. Forgive me...
    Because by smoking an ISOM you are supporting the "enemy" (lol)
    You are only supporting drug dealers, growers, gangs, meth cookers, etc by smoking pot.
    {*insert snide remark here*}
    Trader Rating: +2112


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    38° 59′ 26″ N, 77° 1′ 35″ W
    Posts
    1,476

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by drew_goring View Post
    Because by smoking an ISOM you are supporting the "enemy" (lol)
    You are only supporting drug dealers, growers, gangs, meth cookers, etc by smoking pot.
    Yep, ISOM comes from communists. I believe General Jack D. Ripper put it best: Mandrake, have you ever seen a Commie drink a glass of water? Case and point, Commies don’t drink water, hence they don’t know squat about the Essence of life and purity. Actually you can find a whole litany of reasons why commies are bad by consulting Dr. Strangelove. Now while ISOM's come from commies, drugs come from terrorizing, manipulative drug lords, unless its weed or shrooms, then it comes from hippies, college kids or entrepreneurs(god bless free economy). But getting back to where all this started, I don’t like driving around people who have been drinking, but I really don’t like driving around generally bad drivers. With all the focus on stopping drunk drivers, people have forgotten about the other hazard on the road, bad drivers. I wish there was something as aggressive for them as for the drunks. Now I'm not saying I'm a perfect driver, but I strive to be. It seams, and I'm reminded of this on a daily basis, that not everyone strives to be a better, considerate and safe driver. Taxi drivers, diplomats, old people, fast people, 'king of the road people', young people, etc...
    The very existence of flame-throwers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done." -unknown

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •