CoventryCat86

[labmonkey]

Hex - he keeps "admitting" his part in it - yet continues to act the part - then apologizes - then does it again... Sorry, but he needs to re-read all of his previous posts. He's not ANYWHERE near as innocent as he's saying he is, or being portrayed in this... Even with the apologies...

Apology is one thing, remorse if quite another thing.

And I guess my point is I am apparently the only one who is willing to admit having a part in this, apologize and get past it. That is why I said this is a two way street. several others involved still just want to justify their actions and point the finger.

That is the only reason I have brought it up multiple times.

How long do we have to be told that we should appreciate CC's behavior because it's for our own good when it's very obvious from the first post in this thread that quite a few members want him to chill out (by the way, not a single one of those comments came from me)?

And I am not talking about CC as a person....just his behavior on this board and how he conducts himself.

[labmonkey]

BTW....I am going to Austin til tomorrow....have fun without me guys.....I'm sure it will be hard, but try.....

I'll miss all of you dearly

[CoventryCat86]

And I guess my point is I am apparently the only one who is willing to admit having a part in this, apologize and get past it. That is why I said this is a two way street. several others involved still just want to justify their actions and point the finger.

That is the only reason I have brought it up multiple times.

How long do we have to be told that we should appreciate CC's behavior because it's for our own good when it's very obvious from the first post in this thread that quite a few members want him to chill out (by the way, not a single one of those comments came from me)?

And I am not talking about CC as a person....just his behavior on this board and how he conducts himself.

Just exactly what is "quite a few"?? You and roham jumped ugly on me after only my sixth post here on April 20th. You gave me a lecture about "RESPECT" and suggested that problems like the one I was bringing up with regard to Oblik "should be handled in private" which is dead wrong.

That is not bad behavior on my part, it is an opinion that I have which you disagreed with at the time and hopefully you see that issues like that are indeed best talked about in public rather than whispered in PMs.

You insists that my "behavior" is bad when in fact what most of it boils down to is the fact that you disagree with my opinions and when you do, you respond with attacks and a lack of respect.

Lab, the "those who live in glass houses" analogy applies to you here..

[Roham]

Just exactly what is "quite a few"?? You and roham jumped ugly on me after only my sixth post here on April 20th. You gave me a lecture about "RESPECT" and suggested that problems like the one I was bringing up with regard to Oblik "should be handled in private" which is dead wrong.

Uhm, thats cause your first six posts were as useless as your ensuing 100+... Me and Monkey were the first to call you on it! hehehe

[CoventryCat86]

Uhm, thats cause your first six posts were as useless as your ensuing 100+... Me and Monkey were the first to call you on it! hehehe

You're just making yourself look stupid here roham.

And by the way, the proper way to put that is "Money and I" not "Me and Monkey"
Do you say "Me went to the store" or "I went to the store" ???

Your credibility may increase if you knew how to speak properly, just a suggestion.....

[Roham]

You're just making yourself look stupid here roham.

And by the way, the proper way to put that is "Money and I" not "Me and Monkey"
Do you say "Me went to the store" or "I went to the store" ???

Your credibility may increase if you knew how to speak properly, just a suggestion.....