Continued Discussion with cls515

[SmokinDVM]

First, you make observations. Then, you form a hypothesis. Then, you test this hypothesis. Lack of proof does not discredit a hypothesis. It does not confirm it either.

Can you describe the test you would use to test your hypothesis that god has a hand in the creation of life?

I'm familiar with biochemistry. My education is not outdated. We know that the interactions between amino acids drive conformation, but there is more to it than that. There are four degrees to conformation, with the fourh being how one protein interacts with another protein forming one functional 3-d protein. We know this. But our crystalline studies used to observe the 3-d structure is vague. We just don't have the observations of it. On some we do. But like I said these are very very few and far between. Does our lack of observation disprove 3-d shape? No, because we know it happens. It is just more research is necessary. And, I'm not talking about any watchmaker problem.

Actually, their are about 5,000+ proteins in a living organism, about 30% of which are lipid soluble (most are water soluble). It's these lipid soluble proteins that scientists were having a problem with. However, that problem was at least partially solved several years ago.
Anyway, you were using a "watchmaker argument" in your post. You stated that due to the complexity of life, you knew god had to have a hand in its creation.