Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: The "great mystery" cigar review

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    SFG75 Guest

    Default The "great mystery" cigar review

    Jason(Jaewing, a.k.a.-Jaewon ) was a great guy and sent me three unbanded cigars to do a taste test on. I've smoked two of them(of the same kind) and here's what I found. I'll edit this post to critique the third cigar later.

    Unbanded #1 & 2-the larger cigars in the baggie of the same brand, they appear to be naturals of some kind.

    Appearance and Construction
    10 of 15

    -Possessed black, pock-marks across the smooth, brown wrapper. I won't deduct a lot of points as these have probably done some traveling.

    Flavor
    22 of 25 points

    Smooth, nutty flavor with notes of cocoa. This would make an excellent breakfast cigar in the morning. I'd say that it's a mild cigar, even unto the very end.

    Smoking Characteristics
    25 of 25

    -#1 had some problems in terms of lighting, though #2 lit evenly and burned consistently well to the very end. The latter cigar also gave off a lot of smoke and had a pure white ash, though aesthetically pleasing....means nothing.

    -The draw on the first one was very stiff, though noticably better on cigar #2


    Overall Impression

    33 of 35 possible 100 points

    #2 was perhaps the better cigar of the two, and perhaps the one that I should make a judgment on. For a mild cigar, it was very pleasant and the after-taste is something everyone will savor.

    Overall rating: 90

    -I would surmise that this cigar is not an ISOM.


    Cigar #3(to be reviewed at a later time)

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Auburn, California
    Posts
    598

    Default So did you look?

    Did you open the envelope yet?

    Actually now that I think about it I goofed and put both of the bands (from the two different cigars I sent without bands) in that envelope. Soooooooo . . . you cannot open it until you smoke the smaller "maduro" stick so as not to spoil the next review.

    Glad you enjoyed them. You will be suprised to see what they are.

    This is fun we should start this as a trend here.
    Let us so live that when we come to die even the undertaker will be sorry. - - Mark Twain

  3. #3
    SFG75 Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jaewing
    Did you open the envelope yet?

    Actually now that I think about it I goofed and put both of the bands (from the two different cigars I sent without bands) in that envelope. Soooooooo . . . you cannot open it until you smoke the smaller "maduro" stick so as not to spoil the next review.

    Glad you enjoyed them. You will be suprised to see what they are.

    This is fun we should start this as a trend here.
    Nope, haven't opened up the envelope yet. I will smoke the smaller stick tonight. It's a dark looking maduro wrapper-should be interesting. Am I right to guess that the larger oens are not ISOMs?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Auburn, California
    Posts
    598

    Default Yes

    You are correct that they are not from the ISOM . . . actually far from it.

    I look forward to your review of the other. It is just too bad that was my last one or I would have sent you two for a better review.

    - Jason
    Let us so live that when we come to die even the undertaker will be sorry. - - Mark Twain

  5. #5
    SFG75 Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jaewing
    You are correct that they are not from the ISOM . . . actually far from it.

    - Jason
    Figured as much, ISOMs leave a toasty after taste in my mouth. I have yet to have one that didn't have that characteristic. Will post later tonight about the smaller cigar. Heading out the door now......

  6. #6
    SFG75 Guest

    Default

    Appearance & Construction:
    15 of 15
    *Excellent draw
    *Flawless, glossy wrapper
    *Clean cut, no unraveling or anything like that

    Flavor:
    20 of 25
    *Heavy spiciness in the beginning, a good assault on one's tongue and mouth in general.
    *3/4ths the way down-mellows out into a rich, almost buttery taste

    Smoking characteristics:
    24 of 25
    *Nice, even burn
    *moderate smoke output
    *Nice smooth feel to it, no "bumpy" veins to skip your fingers over.

    Overall Impression:
    30 of 35
    *Hearty, after dinner cigar to grab your taste buds by the collar
    *Reminds me very much of a Te-Amo. There must be some serious spicy leaf in this one. It's a very coarse and rugged tasting cigar like the Te-Amo. NOt a lot of flavor, but lots of character.
    *After taste reminds me of what lingers after you smoke a Partagas black or CAO MX2. This is a decent maduro.

    Overall rating: 89



    What cigars were these??????



    The light, natural cigars were the Thompson Phoenix series.

    The dark maduro was an Olor Fuerte!.


    Wow, if what the country needs is a good seventy cent cigar, I think I found it in the Thompson Phoenix. Good thing it was an unbanded review, I don't know if I would've smoked it otherwise. Guess that I found a diamond in the rough here.


    Thanks a million Jaewing!.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •