Overall, the flavor was of wood and coffee. Started out with a little pepper through the nose, and then shifted to the coffee about mid way. Medium bodied.
Rating - B
Overall, the flavor was of wood and coffee. Started out with a little pepper through the nose, and then shifted to the coffee about mid way. Medium bodied.
Rating - B
![]()
Wasn't much else to say. It wasn't the most complex cigar I've had, nor was it outstanding. It was good, a solid B cigar. I wouldn't invest in a box. I did not like this cigar as much as the Angeles. Some people have that taste for coffee. I prefer a more "tobacco" flavor.
you found a difference between the two sizes? I haven't had both, so i cannot compare them but how does the taste differ if its the same blend?
The very existence of flame-throwers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done." -unknown
Good question. I have smoked at least a couple of boxes of each of these sizes and they are identical in flavor. Granted, each has slightly different draw/burn characteristics (none of which are bad). I have never sensed coffee in any Tatuaje. Pretty much smooth tobacco with a nice spice. I cannot say that I have really picked up on coffee in any stick other than a Java. Just my opinion. We all have different taste buds- so each to his own....
Mama said a lot of things and be thankful was the one she never minded saying twice
--Drive-By Truckers
Just because cigars carry the same name, different sizes will not all taste the same. The blends are manipulated for each size. A group of tasters will taste blends for a particular size and determine what production will be.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks