Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Graycliff Red label ( Original )

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    CROOKLYN NYC
    Posts
    1,773

    Default Graycliff Red label ( Original )

    Was planning to post this with pics and took one of the cigar. Well I am sure you alkl have seen how it looks.

    The cigar looks good, wrapper in particular. Mine was partially square pressed not sure if that is normal.

    Anyway the experience as a whole was nothing special. A few spicy notes every once in a while but otherwise just plain tobacco with a few harsh notes on some pulls.

    Construction was somewhat faulty as I did have to correct the burn once and had to relight a bit past the half way mark.

    In conclusion: Not my type of a cigar. The vintage 99 was much better. Still have the Ditka XX so that review to follow later on

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia
    Posts
    6,816
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Someone sent me one of these as part of my lottery winnings on CigarSnobs. I was not impressed and would never buy these.
    TBSCigars - "On Holiday"
    Grammar - It's the difference between knowing your crap and knowing you're crap.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •