Results 1 to 20 of 22

Thread: UPDATE: Cigar Tax Bill

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Havana, Cuba
    Posts
    2,339

    Default

    Sounds like good news.
    {*insert snide remark here*}
    Trader Rating: +2112


  2. #2

    Default

    Well, the Senate has the votes to override a veto. The House is about two dozen votes shy of getting a 2/3 majority, but the Democrats are working hard on 15 Republicans to get them to switch their votes. So we are not out of the woods yet, the idiots in the Legislature could still override the veto.
    There's only two kinds of cigars, the kind you like and the kind you don't.

  3. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cigar no baka View Post
    Well, the Senate has the votes to override a veto. The House is about two dozen votes shy of getting a 2/3 majority, but the Democrats are working hard on 15 Republicans to get them to switch their votes. So we are not out of the woods yet, the idiots in the Legislature could still override the veto.
    I agree.

  4. Default

    As stated before, this is probably going to get reworked and put on the table again, and they will still probably use a tobacco tax to fund it. I commend all of you who wrote to your senators to vote against this, but we must remain vigilant and be prepared to do it again when the time comes.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Westminster, CO
    Posts
    2,067

    Default

    I think it's important that we all talk about this bill to those who may not smoke or read these forums. The opposition is already starting the spin that Bush vetoed "the bill" and the media is making it sound as if he cut the funding totally. The important points are that the existing funding has not been cut, it has just not been expanded, and families who do not qualify for medicare but can't afford private health insurance are still covered. Bush vetoed the bill to prevent the expansion of yet another entitlement program and prevent yet another tax increase. It stopped folks who can afford private health insurance from dropping their own and being covered by the government. If passed, this would have allowed a family of 4 making upwards to $80K/year to obtain federal health care benefits paid for by the taxpayers, and "children" upwards to the age of 25 would have been covered by the government.

    We need to talk this up in a way that non-smokers can understand.

  6. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shelby07 View Post
    I think it's important that we all talk about this bill to those who may not smoke or read these forums. The opposition is already starting the spin that Bush vetoed "the bill" and the media is making it sound as if he cut the funding totally. The important points are that the existing funding has not been cut, it has just not been expanded, and families who do not qualify for medicare but can't afford private health insurance are still covered. Bush vetoed the bill to prevent the expansion of yet another entitlement program and prevent yet another tax increase. It stopped folks who can afford private health insurance from dropping their own and being covered by the government. If passed, this would have allowed a family of 4 making upwards to $80K/year to obtain federal health care benefits paid for by the taxpayers, and "children" upwards to the age of 25 would have been covered by the government.

    We need to talk this up in a way that non-smokers can understand.
    Well stated Shelby07.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Westminster, CO
    Posts
    2,067

    Default

    Here's an interesting article by George Will from Newsweek

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21047607...sweek/page/0//

    It's pretty interesting to note that the bill would have required 22,000,000 new smokers to keep it funded. And his point that care for the middle class would be put mostly on the shoulders of lower income families is revealing, too.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shelby07 View Post
    I think it's important that we all talk about this bill to those who may not smoke or read these forums. The opposition is already starting the spin that Bush vetoed "the bill" and the media is making it sound as if he cut the funding totally. The important points are that the existing funding has not been cut, it has just not been expanded, and families who do not qualify for medicare but can't afford private health insurance are still covered. Bush vetoed the bill to prevent the expansion of yet another entitlement program and prevent yet another tax increase. It stopped folks who can afford private health insurance from dropping their own and being covered by the government. If passed, this would have allowed a family of 4 making upwards to $80K/year to obtain federal health care benefits paid for by the taxpayers, and "children" upwards to the age of 25 would have been covered by the government.

    We need to talk this up in a way that non-smokers can understand.
    Excellent points Mark, we all need to spread the word that this is another tax boondoggle.
    There's only two kinds of cigars, the kind you like and the kind you don't.

  9. Default

    The veto override failed today!!! Good news for us...for now.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •