Results 1 to 20 of 217

Thread: The KC/DW Review Series

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default

    Round 3. KO'd

    I did smoke the MB3 but actually wasted a good cigar. At least I think it was good. All I can say for sure is that it burned even, had a good ash and made plenty smoke.

    The Shiraz-Cabernet was great with the rigeye but not a good choice with the cigar. I would have to say that this cigar had good legs, tasted primarily of black currents with overtones of blackberry, mint and vanilla.

    Oh well $12 bucks for nada. I'll try another on a better day, with a glass of port or scotch.

  2. #2

    Default Back to Work

    KC just endowed me with some more awesome sticks to review. Now he's already done the Don Lino Africa Duma, so I'll just smoke, enjoy, and compare my notes with his review. But, I've got an Oliveros LTD, Indian Tabac Super Fuerte Maduro, Comacho 1962 and a hugh Oliveros Padrino Italiana (I didn't know ring guage went to 70).
    Thanks KC, I'll do my best. Tough Job having to smoke all these cigars.

  3. #3

    Default Indian Tabac Super Fuerte Maduro

    This is a box-pressed cigar, somewhat light but firm with a Costa Rican maduro wrapper. The wrapper is not quite as oily as I like to see in a Maduro but otherwise smooth roll and no blemishes.
    For me, toasting maduros always offers up a little surprise as they seem to resist the flame at first and then emit a slight tary odor along with all the goodness of a rich tobacco flavor.
    The draw was very easy and I thought it would burn like a fuse but lasted about 40 minutes. It burned fairly even for the first half and then started to run untill finally the ash was pointing toward India. I detected a little almond, coffee, well balanced, full bodied but no bite. Pretty good flavor but decidedly different. I think it has Honduran fillers so maybe it's all the Costa Rican wrapper that gives that distinct taste.
    All together it was not a bad smoke, but with all the choices these days, I don't think it will be using any space in my humi.
    Thanks again KC for something different to review.
    On a scale of 1-10 I will give it a 7.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    7,539
    Blog Entries
    56

    Default

    Love this series guys, good job!! If you take requests, I would like to see your thoughts on the Camacho 1962.

  5. #5

    Default Your request is my command

    Quote Originally Posted by ashauler View Post
    Love this series guys, good job!! If you take requests, I would like to see your thoughts on the Camacho 1962.
    I'll smoke it this evening. Full-bodied cigar, maybe a premium lager? Come on 5 o'clock!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    7,539
    Blog Entries
    56

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DeeDubya View Post
    I'll smoke it this evening. Full-bodied cigar, maybe a premium lager? Come on 5 o'clock!
    Cool, thanks. I'll be interested to read the review......try for a fairly high hops lager and see what you think about the combo, SamAdams Boston Lager works for me.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Hatfield, PA 19440
    Posts
    210

    Default Camacho 1962

    I'll smoke mine after, and compare notes with DeeDubya. I have had several of these and I love 'em. (And my wife likes the little perfectos!)
    Courage is rightly esteemed the first of human qualities... because it is the quality which guarantees all others.
    -Winston Churchill

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •