CoventryCat86 Ban Poll

[CoventryCat86]

Whatever.

I was referring to some previous posts I recalled where Hex had asked you to stop some commenting (baiting) and I was including the first post in this thread. If anything I used "several" where maybe a "couple" should have been used but that would require me to go searching for all the posts and add them up, and I can't be bothered. Provided we are going by the definition of lying as "a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive; an intentional untruth" then I would have to also point out there was no intent to misrepresent.


-W.

Okay, thanks for the explanation

May I ask that in the future you please choose your words a little more carefully? Had you done that initially, I wouldn't have a leg to stand on if ya know what I mean. I would also strongly suggest and recommend that if you're going to make pretty strong accusation and/or statements you better damn well "be bothered" because shooting from the hip without the facts to back it up is a very bad thing.

This time I'm honestly trying to give you good advice instead of being a smart ass.

[ggiese]

Reading old posts - what a bother... Geez... That takes some work...

Monkey - it obvious that you are so much blinded by your own ignorance to worry about anything that closely resembles the truth. It is bliss, ya know...

And I really mean that in a kind way - I would really hate for you to be offended.

[CoventryCat86]

Actually ggiese I'm pretty bone hurt to see a place like this board go the route that it has lately. Comments like this are exactly the kind of thing that has gotten out of control between members, and all because someone isn't a robot that falls in line when browbeaten. Attack me all you want, talk about dropping flaming bags on my doorstep all you want, if that makes you feel better.

-W.

C'mon Monk, we're just kidding.


Geez, I think you're okay and I'm sure ggiese does too.

We're just funnin' ya so lighten up and play along.

[Monk]

Oh I see, so according to you, when someone does something wrong and/or stupid and more than one person disagrees with it, you conclude it's an "'old boys club' in tag team mode."

Monk, please do yourself a favor and resist the urge to dig your hole deeper.

I'm sorry if you don't like the way I just worded that last statement but that's just me.

How about this, would you like it better if I said:

"Monk, you're a great guy and you are a huge asset to this board. Your opinion and input is extremely valuable here and you've been a comtributing member for quite some time. Just so you can't be preceived as getting yourself in hot water, it might me a good idea to just give this whole thread a pass and not make anymore posts here."

I would like to say that but most of it is just plain not true and the rest is just fluff and bullshit.........

Isn't it though? If someone doesn't agree with the members who have been here longer they seem to get the bad end of a stick in my experience, and any time they have been here just doesn't seem to be good enough for them to be allowed to have a different opinion without reprecussions.

Your last comments are quite enlightening actually. Thanks,

-W.

[Monk]

Okay, thanks for the explanation

May I ask that in the future you please choose your words a little more carefully?

I seem to be lagging a post behing in post time here, its getting all crossed over. Anyhow, you are right. I was drunk last night so didn't put as much thought into an intelligent post as I should have.

-W.

[ggiese]

Actually ggiese I'm pretty bone hurt to see a place like this board go the route that it has lately. Comments like this are exactly the kind of thing that has gotten out of control between members, and all because someone isn't a robot that falls in line when browbeaten. Attack me all you want, talk about dropping flaming bags on my doorstep all you want, if that makes you feel better.

-W.

You don't like it? Fix it. Don't whine about it.

...and I'm not "talking" about dropping flaming bags of poop on your doorstep - I am dropping a flaming bag of poop on your doorstep. I got my passport and everything! And I'm coming to Toronto in two weeks. Listen for the doorbell...

[heftysmokes]

hey monk...i haven't been here as long as these other guys and i've had a different opinion on more than one occasion. i've even butted heads a bit here and there and cam through relatively unscathed so if there's one piece of advice i can give you--make damn sure you can back up every sentence you write...these jokers have too damn much time on their hands to let even the smallest generalization slide!
Also, try to make sure you spell correctly. I've worked with elementary school teachers who are less hard on the "grammatically challenged" than CC.
And one more thing, don't be afraid to bust balls...for the most part, they can take it as well as they give it.

[heftysmokes]

just wait, they're going to nail me on my lack of capitalization!

[ggiese]

C'mon Monk, we're just kidding.


Geez, I think you're okay and I'm sure ggiese does too.

We're just funnin' ya so lighten up and play along.

Damn you CC - don't you get all weak kneed on me!!! We ain't funnin' Speak for yourself!

If you're not going to get him with the flaming bag of poop, I am!!!

[Monk]

Also, try to make sure you spell correctly. I've worked with elementary school teachers who are less hard on the "grammatically challenged" than CC.
And one more thing, don't be afraid to bust balls...for the most part, they can take it as well as they give it.

Well I didn't want to point out CC's misspelling of perceived (preceived) in post #76 since I know it will come back to haunt me someday when I mis-type

-W.

[CoventryCat86]

Isn't it though? If someone doesn't agree with the members who have been here longer they seem to get the bad end of a stick in my experience, and any time they have been here just doesn't seem to be good enough for them to be allowed to have a different opinion without reprecussions.

Your last comments are quite enlightening actually. Thanks,

-W.

Okay, I can see how it may appear that way but honestly I don't think it happens as often as you may think.

For instance, propheticjoe has had disagreements with me and so has dickson. For the most part, these disagreements are worked out and everyone walks away either agreeing to disagree or changing their position due to well thought out respectful points from the person they initially had the disagreement with. This has happened with me and Nate (propheticjoe) on at least two or three occasions that I can recall and I think the world of him and highly respect him when he posts something that "calls me out" or whatever you want to call it. Same with Dickson, we may disagree and there are times when he and I say to each other "Oh yeah, I see your point!" and all is well.

There have been MANY other people that have had differences with others and can tell you the same types of stories.

It's all in how you present it. Yep, sometimes my "style" ain't the prettiest but that's just me....

[CoventryCat86]

hey monk...i haven't been here as long as these other guys and i've had a different opinion on more than one occasion. i've even butted heads a bit here and there and cam through relatively unscathed so if there's one piece of advice i can give you--make damn sure you can back up every sentence you write...these jokers have too damn much time on their hands to let even the smallest generalization slide!
Also, try to make sure you spell correctly. I've worked with elementary school teachers who are less hard on the "grammatically challenged" than CC.
And one more thing, don't be afraid to bust balls...for the most part, they can take it as well as they give it.

LMAO!

[CoventryCat86]

Well I didn't want to point out CC's misspelling of perceived (preceived) in post #76 since I know it will come back to haunt me someday when I mis-type

-W.

Well DAMMIT ya should have. How in hell do you guys expect me to be the "Grammarian" if you're going to let me slide on spelling things wrong.

Now I'm mad at you again.....

[Monk]

Well DAMMIT ya should have. How in hell do you guys expect me to be the "Grammarian" if you're going to let me slide on spelling things wrong.

Now I'm mad at you again.....

-W.

[CoventryCat86]

-W.

See, now you're gettin' it!

[ggiese]

See, now you're gettin' it!

Knock it off!!! Next thing you know people will be thinking you're an OK guy, CC - we can't have that, I love the evil CC!!!

[Monk]

See, now you're gettin' it!

I believe the correct term is "getting".



-W.

[heftysmokes]

I wish I was getting it right now...hell, I wouldn't mind a little "gettin' it" either.

[cinda]

I wish I was getting it right now...hell, I wouldn't mind a little "gettin' it" either.

you might get it more if you did not eat so much bratwurst !

[CoventryCat86]

I hope one of the things it says about me is I have an opinion. Since I am so new and don't know you from Adam, I don't think it was totally directed at me, if it was, my loss.

As this progressed, I realized that as I said I did not have the whole story, as from what I can understand of this sad story. alot was said in pm and chats. In hindsight, maybe I should have not pulled the trigger so quickly, oh well. I still stand by my statement, most of what I have ready by cc left an impression of how large of an asshole his is (maybe his intention). If by voting in this, I have offend many and place a large "L" on my forehead, I say

Yep, a real class act you are.........

Oh and your "opinion" is a stupid one.