Results 1 to 20 of 64

Thread: logan37's reviews

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    807
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Nope, no dirt torpedo in there that I know of, but I do have a lot of cigars to smoke, so I might just find one yet.
    Smoke em' if you got em'

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Key West, FL
    Posts
    1,474

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by denver24 View Post
    Nope, no dirt torpedo in there that I know of, but I do have a lot of cigars to smoke, so I might just find one yet.
    Get a priest if you find one.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Key West, FL
    Posts
    1,474

    Default Montecristo Club Cabinet #30

    Robusto shape(5x50)
    Wrapper: USA/Connecticut
    Filler: Dominican Republic/Brazilian
    Binder: Dominican Republic

    Drink: Iced Coffee

    This cigar had a dark reddish-brown toothy wrapper and smelled grassy. Construction was solid. There was one pretty stiff vein, but it was not a problem when I smoked it. The cap cut cleanly. The pre-light draw was clear and tasted like hay.

    After lighting the cigar a pretty large space opened up on one side of the cigar. I can only guess that there was a loose spot(even though I didn't feel it).

    At first this cigar was very spicy and tasted grassy. Halfway down the spice just died almost to nothing. A taste of raw walnuts came out just after the spice disappeared. The taste of walnuts stayed the same and the grassy taste dwindled down. The taste of grass disappeared towards the end of the stick and the spiciness came back. Mild at first and continued getting stronger, but no where as strong as when I first fired it up. The finish of the cigar became oily. I thought it was from tar build up, so I purged to no avail. The oily taste remained. I smoked it a little it longer until I was hit by a really oily puff.

    The draw on the cigar was cool for the entire length. It produced a decent amount of smoke that smelled mildly sweet and floral.

    Over all this was an ok cigar. Not at all what I expected from Montecristo. Monte's are one of my favorite brands but I would pass up the club cabinet if any other Monte was available.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Key West, FL
    Posts
    1,474

    Default Montecristo Seven

    Churchill (7x50)
    Wrapper: Ecuador Sumatran
    Binder: Dominican Republic
    Filler: Dominican Republic/Brazilian

    Drink: Earl Grey tea

    I've been eying these cigars for a few weeks now and I finally decided to take the plunge and won a tin of these on CBid.

    Just in case someone is not familiar with these cigars...
    Quote Originally Posted by cigarsinternational.com
    The factory’s highest level, most seasoned and time-tested rollers are given the designation ’Level 7 Roller.’ That’s the inspiration for this blend. Montecristo Sevens are a special limited-edition Monte blend, beautiful handmades available in one size only, a 7” x 50 churchill. Each cigar is dressed in a seamless, chocolate brown Ecuadorian-grown Sumatra wrapper, filled with vintage Dominican and Brazilian long-fillers. The smoke is mild to medium in body, coating the palate with refined layers of rich, smooth flavors. A Spanish cedar sleeve covers each cigar, adding yet another layer of flavor to this aged blend.
    The cigar was presented in a cedar wrapper that stretched almost the entire length of it. At the top was a very ornate band, which really strays from the usual Monte bands. When I slid the cedar/band off a second identical band was wrapped around the cigar. A very nice surprise. I usually take off the bands before I fire up a stick, but I left this one on since they went through the trouble of putting a 2nd one on.

    For the cigar itself; this cigar was beautiful. The construction was perfect. The Sumatran wrapper was dark brown and a little toothy. The cigar had an earthy, mild cedar smell to it. The pre-light draw was very clear and tasted slightly earthy.

    After toasting the foot a nutty scent peaked out. As I puffed on the stick, I was immediately hit with a nice amount of spice and nutty flavors. The finish on the cigars was a refreshingly mild tartness. The tartness gave a nice balance to the spice of smoke. The actual smoke was heavy and bright white. The ash produced was very thick and grey. In the middle of the cigar the spice mellowed out quite a bit and the smoke became slightly sweet but still finished with the tart. Near the end of the cigar the spice came back and gradually got stronger up until the end. The tartness went away as the spice picked up. The draw was extremely cool most of the stick. Near the end it became a little warm, but a minutes rest remedied that.

    This was a very nice, balanced cigar. A must try for any Monte fan.

    * H. Upmann and RyJ also have a seven series created by the same rollers(the only difference I can find is the wrappers on each are different)
    Quote Originally Posted by JRcigars.com
    The Upmann cigars are wrapped in a magnificent golden brown Connecticut shade, the Romeo y Julieta cigars are wrapped in a magnificent tawny-brown Ecuador Connecticut, and the Montecristo cigars wrapped in a magnificent chocolate-brown Ecuador Sumatra.
    **sorry for the length. I was excited about this one.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	monte7.jpg 
Views:	385 
Size:	47.2 KB 
ID:	899  
    Last edited by logan37; 10-23-2008 at 10:59 PM.

  5. #5

    Default

    Great review, that certainly makes me want one.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Key West, FL
    Posts
    1,474

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DeeDubya View Post
    Great review, that certainly makes me want one.
    is that so...?

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by logan37 View Post
    is that so...?
    Naaaa... That was just meaningless jabber. I hate Montecristo's.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •