“Smoking cigars as an art form"

[buzz]

In the last edition of Cigar Snob Magazine I saw a phrase that caught my attention and reflects a little of how I feel sometimes in this Forum " A woman's touch ....in a man's world"
what they forgot to say is the cigar world isn't only a man's world but a world of humanity including men and women. Of course this magazine exposes half naked women more than cigar news.

God bless you

Daysi

So then - are you scolding the magazine for containing cigar-related pictures with half-naked women?

http://www.cigarsmokers.com/threads/...922#post154922

Daysi, some advice: don't focus so much on the man vs. woman thing here.

-Buzz

[daysiartpainter]

So then - are you scolding the magazine for containing cigar-related pictures with half-naked women?

http://www.cigarsmokers.com/threads/...922#post154922

Daysi, some advice: don't focus so much on the man vs. woman thing here.

-Buzz

I am a married woman, the subject woman VERSUS man is not a problem for me . I leave it to 911 and Children and family Department. With regard to my painting " Canela Skin; is a portrait that , It is just art . I think that a Cigar magazine, needs to show more cigar news that half naked women. Luckily alive in the USA where I can be expressed freely, Are you agree

Daysi

[heftysmokes]

I've really tried, but I don't have a clue as to what the fuck you're talking about.

[heftysmokes]

Oh, and I have some good quotes, too...

"My dog only gives golden showers to bushes he thinks are slutty."
-Rob Huebel

and...

"People are often surprised at the sight of my naked body. And it's not just because I'm standing in their child's closet."
-Rob Delaney

[Paddy]

I am a married woman, the subject woman VERSUS man is not a problem for me . I leave it to 911 and Children and family Department. With regard to my painting " Canela Skin; is a portrait that , It is just art . I think that a Cigar magazine, needs to show more cigar news that half naked women. Luckily alive in the USA where I can be expressed freely, Are you agree

Daysi

I believe at the very beginning of this thread I diagnoses
Down syndrome. I stand by it.

[ashauler]

I believe at the very beginning of this thread I diagnoses
Down syndrome. I stand by it.

Down's syndrome ain't fuckin' funny to me.

[Paddy]

Down's syndrome ain't fuckin' funny to me.

If she actually had Down’s syndrome it would not be funny.
But she does not. So I don’t see the harm done.

[heftysmokes]

Down's syndrome ain't fuckin' funny to me.

Agree.

[Paddy]

Here we go.
I forgot it depends on who you are, as to what you can say.
Some can say what ever they want. Others not.
This place has gotten ridiculous.
Please think up your witty and sarcastic posts.
I will not log back in to read them
Adios.

[ashauler]

Here we go.
I forgot it depends on who you are, as to what you can say.
Some can say what ever they want. Others not.
This place has gotten ridiculous.
Please think up your witty and sarcastic posts.
I will not log back in to read them
Adios.

I don't give a shit who would have said it, I would feel the same way, and would have posted what I did.

[badwhale]

Here we go.
I forgot it depends on who you are, as to what you can say.
Some can say what ever they want. Others not.
This place has gotten ridiculous.
Please think up your witty and sarcastic posts.
I will not log back in to read them
Adios.

Way to spaz the fuck out...again....in daysi's blog thread no-less.

[daysiartpainter]

Where were you get that so-called "Down's syndrome" ? Remember a free society cannot be structured to soothe the hardcore faithful (rat in popular language ). It is based on a deal. You have an absolute right to voice your beliefs – but the price is that I too have a right to respond as I wish. Neither of us can set aside the rules and demand to be protected from offense. See and learn



Daysi

[heftysmokes]

Here we go.
I forgot it depends on who you are, as to what you can say.
Some can say what ever they want. Others not.
This place has gotten ridiculous.
Please think up your witty and sarcastic posts.
I will not log back in to read them
Adios.

I couldn't think of anything witty myself, so I'll use a quote (seems to be the theme on this thread):

"Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out."
-My Grandpa (who I'm sure heard it from someone else)

[buzz]

Here we go.
I forgot it depends on who you are, as to what you can say.
Some can say what ever they want. Others not.
This place has gotten ridiculous.
Please think up your witty and sarcastic posts.
I will not log back in to read them
Adios.

Paddy, for the record - a search of the entire site (using both the CS.com search and Google) turns up only one mention of Down's Syndrome. One. There are a handful of cases where "retarded" is used, but most of those are people saying "socially retarded", which in my opinion is very different.

-Buzz

[heftysmokes]

I believe at the very beginning of this thread I diagnoses
Down syndrome. I stand by it.

Well, I didn't know we had a neurobiologist in the house. Maybe you can diagnose the other idiots on this board as well.

[cinda]

I think that a Cigar magazine, needs to show more cigar news that half naked women. Luckily alive in the USA where I can be expressed freely, Are you agree

Daysi

I wasn't going to say anything in this thread but I feel compelled to to add a comment regarding the above quote, for I disagree that censoring pictures will make it more informative. I 'll begin by saying the only cigar magazine that I have been exposed to is cigar aficionado. Frankly, in my opinion that magazine is a piece of art. The book is over sized, the pictures are bold, glossy, and full of beauty. I have known the covers of the magazine to be adorned with strong, rich, intelligent, funny, worldly men which are all quality's that I find very sexy. For me cigar aficionado magazine does more for me then a playgirl magazine. However, I tell my husband I buy it for the article shhhhhhhhhh! I think its important to remember how information is forwarded is best determine by the audience. The beautiful photos of the cigars and their bans are timeless. Cigar bands and boxes were original created to be beautiful and artsy to lure the person in to an experience before your other senses could be plaited. In addition, cigar advertising encompassed all types woman and how they were portrait in that time. Clad woman are part of that advertising history although I myself have yet to see naked woman in that magazine.
On the other hand, I don't think you could denied the photo of Alejandro Robaina smoking a cigar August 2010 magazine tells a history before any written word is read. Much like your paintings photos in a cigar magazine should capture the history, the culture and the beauty of the cigar 's emancipation to compliant any written articles in the magazine.
I hope this is as clear as mudd!

[mail man]

I agree with Cinda, I read a couple of Archery mags, and in them, they show bikini clad women holding a bow...fortunately, the bow is usually nicer than some of the girls.

The one thing that bothers me about Daysi's posts is that she is crying for us to uphold her FREDOM of speech, but in the same breath, she is crying out for censorship of a magazine that she reads under her own persuasion.

[ggiese]

I wasn't going to say anything in this thread but I feel compelled to to add a comment regarding the above quote, for I disagree that censoring pictures will make it more informative. I 'll begin by saying the only cigar magazine that I have been exposed to is cigar aficionado. Frankly, in my opinion that magazine is a piece of art. The book is over sized, the pictures are bold, glossy, and full of beauty. I have known the covers of the magazine to be adorned with strong, rich, intelligent, funny, worldly men which are all quality's that I find very sexy. For me cigar aficionado magazine does more for me then a playgirl magazine. However, I tell my husband I buy it for the article shhhhhhhhhh! I think its important to remember how information is forwarded is best determine by the audience. The beautiful photos of the cigars and their bans are timeless. Cigar bands and boxes were original created to be beautiful and artsy to lure the person in to an experience before your other senses could be plaited. In addition, cigar advertising encompassed all types woman and how they were portrait in that time. Clad woman are part of that advertising history although I myself have yet to see naked woman in that magazine.
On the other hand, I don't think you could denied the photo of Alejandro Robaina smoking a cigar August 2010 magazine tells a history before any written word is read. Much like your paintings photos in a cigar magazine should capture the history, the culture and the beauty of the cigar 's emancipation to compliant any written articles in the magazine.
I hope this is as clear as mudd!

Clear as can be, Grinella!

But - this is what I have to say about that...

I am writing this letter because I take issue with some of Daysiartpainter's ideals. Although my approach may appear a bit pedantic, by setting some generative point of view against a structural-taxonomical point of view or vice versa, I intend to argue that Daysiartpainter's reasoning is circular and therefore invalid. In other words, she always begins an argument with her conclusion (e.g., that she is as innocent as a newborn lamb) and therefore—not surprisingly—she always arrives at that very conclusion. The law is not just a moral stance. It is the consensus of society on our minimum standards of behavior. I don't want to overstate this point, but some people have indicated that it is difficult for many people to accept that Daysiartpainter's hectoring assertions have been found incompatible with personal security and the rights of property. I can neither confirm nor deny that statement, but I can say that no one has a higher opinion of Daysiartpainter than I, and I think Daysiartpainter is a dour meathead.

Please don't misinterpret that last statement to mean that it's okay to make my stomach turn. That's not at all what it means. Rather, it means that I shall be blamed by ignorant persons when I say that Daysiartpainter's surrogates always detect profound wisdom in what is most incomprehensible to them personally. Cruel as that maxim may appear, her childish "Mine! Mine! Mine! Now! Now! Now!" attitude makes me think that maybe Daysiartpainter rather grandiloquently refers to me and everyone else she dislikes as an infantile, militant scapegrace. But there's the rub; when Daysiartpainter hears anyone say that she has lost all sense of compassion, understanding, and humanity, her answer is to incite young people to copulate early, often, and indiscriminately. That's similar to taking a few drunken swings at a beehive: it just makes me want even more to get us out of the hammerlock in which she is holding us.

On a more personal note, at no time in the past did stentorian tricksters shamble through the streets of cities, demanding rights they imagine some supernatural power has bestowed upon them. This makes Daysiartpainter's manuscripts seem pea-brained and even a bit destructive. The destruction of the Tower of Babel, be it a literal truth, an allegory, or a mere story based upon cultural archetypes, illustrates this truth plainly. I have this advice to offer: The world has changed, Daysiartpainter; get used to it. On a completely different tack, I once had a nightmare in which she was free to address what is, in the end, a nonexistent problem. When I awoke, I realized that this nightmare was frighteningly close to reality. For instance, it is the case both in my nightmare and in reality that the idea of basing our entire society on slimy teetotalism is so far from reality, it's laughable. Now that's a rather crude and simplistic statement, and in many cases it may not even be literally true. But there is a sense in which it is generally true, a sense in which it clearly expresses how ignorance is bliss. This may be why Daysiartpainter's flacks are generally all smiles. Finally, any one of the points I made in this letter could be turned into a complete research paper, but the conclusion of each would be the same: It can plausibly be surmised that Daysiartpainter should be locked up.

[Devil Doc]

Ah fer Christ's sakes! I told you guys we should have stuck to discussing her ass.

Doc.

[cigarsarge]

Ah fer Christ's sakes! I told you guys we should have stuck to discussing her ass.

Doc.

I still maintain it can't be that big.