Review These - Reviews

[thepyrofish]

Cigar #1 was a Cacique Miama
Cigar #2 was a Private Stock by Davidoff

The Miami cost around $8 locally, whereas the PS is $10.50

[mauied1101]

So tonight was warm enough that I ventured out on the balcony to smoke these babies (and yet tomorrow we have snow forecasted).

Cigar #2-

Pre-smoke impression
Wrapper was dark, rich, and slightly oily, construction was excellent; firm yet had just a little spring - boxed pressed - loved the smell - strong, fragrant bouquet (sorry, borrowing wine term).

Once lit and consistently through the smoke, it had a great draw, white ash that hung on for a while. Tasted slightly spicy, with the flavor of a nice cup of stronger coffee. Toward the half way mark, got a lot spicier. I really enjoyed this cigar - reminded me of the Torano 1959 but better.

Tomorrow (barring me freezing my fingers off) I'll smoke #1 and post it then.

Cigar #1-

Pre-smoke impression
Natural wrapper, good construction; firm but no supple - boxed press. Smell - I have to admit that I opened both up initially and the #2 smelled better so I smoked it first... this one smelled a little bit more mild - indistinct, but I was curious to smoke it.

Once lit, it started out with a bang - very peppery and strong from the get go. Easy draw - almost like smoking a cigarette, salt & pepper ash. Got more spicy as the smoke continued.

I'd have to say that my preference was #2, just seemed to have more body, more elegant - this one was a bit harsh. Soo.... my guess is that #2 is the more expensive stick. Would love to find out what they were!

This was a fun experience - would have smoked them one after the other but I think I would have burned a hole through my mouth.

Looking forward to hearing the actuals.

Thanks Drew!

[drew_goring]

Nice reviews...a little off in the guesses though.

cigar number 2 you had a good idea of. It was a Torano 1959. I am assuming you though it was better only because it was free MSRP is was about 10 dollars.

cigar number 2 was a Padron '64. Definately one of my top 3 favorite smokes. Obviously the more expensive smoke at about 10 bucks a pop.

This is a great thread. It was a lot of fun picking the cigars to send for the review.

[mauied1101]

Nice reviews...a little off in the guesses though.

cigar number 2 you had a good idea of. It was a Torano 1959. I am assuming you though it was better only because it was free MSRP is was about 10 dollars.

cigar number 2 was a Padron '64. Definately one of my top 3 favorite smokes. Obviously the more expensive smoke at about 10 bucks a pop.

This is a great thread. It was a lot of fun picking the cigars to send for the review.

but but... which one was the real #2?

[drew_goring]

but but... which one was the real #2?

shit, you got me damn typos are owning me today.

Cigar #1 was the Padron '64

Cigar #2 was the Torano 1959.

Hope you enjoyed them

[mauied1101]

So one of the fun things about this is that you *know* one of the sticks is going to be great, and the other one will either be greater or not. Being the sheltered body that I am, just in case I would be wrong on the more valuable stick (which I was), I smoked both of them to a nub. Both were nice sticks (cheers Drew).

[illilli]

I received two lovely cigars to review from mauied1101. Here is my review:

Cigar # 1

5.5 x 38-42

This cigar was very well constructed and firm. It had a nice pre-smoke aroma and looked like it had been stored with the sleeve off. Some of the wrapper at the foot had worn away making me believe that it had been stored in a humidor for a while.

The cigar lit easily and burned evenly throughout its length. It held a nice long ash, which was grayish white. Overall, the smoke was medium, leaning toward the mild side. The draw was perfect and it produced plenty of thick white smoke. The flavor was earthy, maybe leathery, and seemed to change subtely about half-way through where a slight cedar taste emerged.

For my taste, it was an OK smoke. I could certainly smoke one again, but I wouldn't put it ahead of my regular smokes. This is due to it being a little milder than I prefer. I am sure I have not had this brand and size of cigar before. If I were to venture a guess, I'd say RP Vintage "Euro" Corona, but I have absolutely no idea.

Cigar # 2

5.5 x 48ish

This cigar was very smooth and felt solid in my hand. It didn't smell like much before lighting. It had a Claro color and possibly a slight greenish tint to it. It was a torpedo shape.

I toasted the foot and then lit it. It lit quickly and perfectly. While I had expected a light flavor profile; I got a medium to medium-full bonanza! It burned very evenly and held a nice long, white ash. Superb draw and plenty of rich,white smoke. The flavor was wood with slight undertones of a slight nutmeg taste and possibly licorice. I can't quite put my finger on the taste overall, but I liked it very much.

This cigar tasted familiar to me in some ways and in other ways, like nothing I have had before. At first, I thought it was a La Gloria Cubana. Later though, the flavor changed to something unfamiliar. Overall, I liked this cigar better than #1. (I've probably picked the $2.00 Cigar, wouldn't you know it!) I could smoke more of this one. It went very well with my Jim Beam and Diet Coke. This would be a great lake cigar. Again, I have absolutely no idea, but I'll guess that this is an Edge by Rocky Patel.