bush with blind reporter...

**Shelby07** · 06-16-2006, 01:13 PM

Originally Posted by dagobert

Sorry, Shelby. But imho. the last people who get direct orders from the lord are dead for probably 2000 years. If a president is telling such BS, it should be legal to call him stupid.

Or what would you say, if this will happen with your neigbor? I would tell him, that he had too many drinks...

It's like Schroeder in Germany; He was intelligent in some areas, but primitive and stupid as a chancellor. The best sample was his last TV Interview after the elections. Seems he was totally drunk. The only he was interested in, was his own benefit out of the position.
The only Bush is interested in, is his private "crusade" against the "anticrist". Both politics were not and are not interested in the peoples problems.

Bush is simply not the right man for the job. That's my opinion. Such a country should be representated by a integer man, not by ex-actors or president-sons. There are millions of them in US. But they haven't the money to win (or buy?) a election.

It's a pity, isn't it?

Your opinion is noted and respected and I can agree with some of it, but please explain to me how making a mistake with a reporter supports it.