Quote Originally Posted by jaewing View Post
Maybe you ought to READ more and do more research before you quote Democrat "talking points" and claim to have all the facts. Check this out from June 21, 2006.

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50746

Maybe you would like to print a retraction to your original thread?

Funny how all the bad news makes headlines and the news of progress and victory is conveniently ignored by the media and the Dems. What is their agenda?

1) The Washington Post article is not a Democrat, Republican, or Greenpeace Party "talking point". It cites the results of the US Military investigation.

2) The WorldNetDaily article you cited refers to "degraded munitions". Degraded means no worky, dud, not a problem. The small number of degraded munitions found in Iraq were refered to in the Washington Post article:

"But the Pentagon and outside experts stressed that these abandoned shells, many found in ones and twos, were 15 years old or more, their chemical contents were degraded, and they were unusable as artillery ordnance. Since the 1990s, such "orphan" munitions, from among 160,000 made by Iraq and destroyed, have turned up on old battlefields and elsewhere in Iraq, ex-inspectors say. In other words, this was no surprise."

I see that you are among the 50% who cannot, or will not face the facts.