Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Bush and the environment

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Precipitously close to disaster.
    Posts
    7,007

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmokinDVM View Post
    Good point CC.

    So, conversely, any position taken by the extreme right wingers can also be summarily rejected.

    Ergo, everything the present admin. has done over the last 6 years should be reversed immediately.

    That's just absolutely genius CC.

    Yes, Barry - I, myself, personally would be extremely suspicious of any polls or data coming from the far right. And I have a funny feeling you're suspicious as well...

    Ya know - there are three "truths" in every political truth - there's what the left says, what the right says and the ACTUAL truth, which lies somewhere in between...

    Now as far as reversing everything the present administration has done over the last 6 years.... I don't understand what that would have to do with any poll concerning the environment... Are you suggesting that somewhere there are dots which connect between a largely liberal group giving poor grades to the present administration for its environmental policies and the smoking gun which leads to ALL of the current administrations policies being deficient??

    Never mind... I know what your answer to that question will be...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Harrison, AR
    Posts
    183
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I suppose all 6000 scientists are liberals?

    Just as all "creationists" are conservative anti-scientists that approve of polluting our water and clear-cutting our forests?

    This president should not be the only one to have ever received an "F" but it IS the grade he deserves. Only a fool would argue otherwise.
    --Gerald

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Precipitously close to disaster.
    Posts
    7,007

    Default

    Statistics are interesting critters... I once attended a class where the professor statistically proved that mash potatoes causes insane behavior. I think statistics have to be taken with a grain of salt... Certainly 6,000 scientists, crossing the entire political spectrum, will report their findings, and some group or entity will interpret those findings. It's how those findings are interpreted, and not what the individual scientists reported that ultimately hits the papers...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia
    Posts
    6,816
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by designwise1 View Post
    I suppose all 6000 scientists are liberals?

    Just as all "creationists" are conservative anti-scientists that approve of polluting our water and clear-cutting our forests?

    This president should not be the only one to have ever received an "F" but it IS the grade he deserves. Only a fool would argue otherwise.
    Answers to your questions in order:
    1. No.
    2. ALL creationists are not conservative. It depends on what your definition of "polluting our water" is and clear-cutting our forests isn't always a bad thing.
    3. You may think he deserves an "F" but not everyone else does and just because someone's opinion differs from yours does not make them a "fool."
    TBSCigars - "On Holiday"
    Grammar - It's the difference between knowing your crap and knowing you're crap.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •