Once again Bill, no one said a darn thing and called me out when this occured monts ago. So I must ask:
Where was Bill?
(A little '88 election lingo there for you.)
Once again Bill, no one said a darn thing and called me out when this occured monts ago. So I must ask:
Where was Bill?
(A little '88 election lingo there for you.)
Corresponding Authority
For the THIRD time Scotty (you are either too stupid to grasp this concept OR my guess is that once again, you are trying to direct attention here away from the FACT that you intentionally put a damaged cigar in a pass)Originally Posted by SFG75
Once again Bill, no one said a darn thing and called me out when this occured monts ago. So I must ask:
Where was Bill?
(A little '88 election lingo there for you.)
I DID NOT LOOK AT THE THREAD AFTER I MADE MY PUTS AND TAKES UNTIL JUST YESTERDAY WHEN I DECIDED TO REVIEW YOUR PASSING AND TRADING HABITS BECAUSE I THINK YOUR SELF PROCLAIMED MONIKER OF "DON OF PASSES" IS RIDICULOUS.
Can I may myself any clearer or will you once again try and distract attention away from the fact that you are about the worst kind of person one can have as a participant in a pass?
I hope the 3rd party observers are taking notes here. You see, when the spotlight is shone on someone's poor passing and trading habits, they should own up to it and apologize. But no, not ole Scotty Boy.
The next pass he's in that where he screws up, he'll handle it just like he did here, trying to lie his way out of it, make excuses, downplay his underhanded actions, etc. and just generally cause trouble instead or working towareds a solution.
Typicall Scotty........
You're one heck of a watchdog Bill.
Just to highlight the reason why you are bringing this up now and not back then:
Where was Bill?
*Rough guess??-two weeks maximum time. I remember that we went up there for that reason because I wanted to have som super-premies to make plays.
Corresponding Authority
LMAO, irrelevant Scotty, the issue here is why did you intentionally put a damaged cigar in a pass? The fact that I did not discover it until now does not automatically exonerate you. Sorry but there is no statute of limitations on your poor manners and passing practices.You're one heck of a watchdog Bill.
Just to highlight the reason why you are bringing this up now and not back then:
Where was Bill?
You just keep trying to divert attention from the matter at hand. The more you do it the more you prove my point.
Funny, folks knew of the condition of the cigar when Randy posted about it. He was simply warning people of it's condition from unintentional wear and tear. If he or others thought it was intentional, and that here was a pattern of me doing this in passes(keep in mind that this was like my fifth one at that time) then I would've been called out on it. Alas, I wasn't. Anthills Bill, all antihills. Cigars are damaged in passes, that's life. I had to live with my three damaged sticks and nobody was encouraging me to go after others. It's called the benefit of a doubt. Though for you, it's an opportunity in mudslinging and partial truth telling.
BTW-In the end, it's Randy's call since he's the pass host. If he thinks I screwed him, he'll say so. Don't be so pretentious as to pretend to speak for him. I'll talk to him later tonight as he returns from Omaha. If he wants me to replace an unintentionally damaged cigar that I pad $20.55 for, then I gladly do that. What do you think of that Bill?
I think an Ashton Cabinet #3 would cover a La Uncia cameroon Torp#1. I'll ask him tonight, no-I'll insist that he take it and you can go on your tardy watchdog ways.
Corresponding Authority
You paid over $20.00 for a $14.00 cigar? You are a fool.BTW-In the end, it's Randy's call since he's the pass host. If he thinks I screwed him, he'll say so. Don't be so pretentious as to pretend to speak for him. I'll talk to him later tonight as he returns from Omaha. If he wants me to replace an unintentionally damaged cigar that I pad $20.55 for, then I gladly do that. What do you think of that Bill?
I think an Ashton Cabinet #3 would cover a La Uncia cameroon Torp#1. I'll ask him tonight, no-I'll insist that he take it and you can go on your tardy watchdog ways.
I also think you KNOW Randy well enough that he would NEVER say "Yeah Scott, I think you SHOULD do something about that damaged stick" because Randy, having the heart of gold that he does, would never say that. Hell, I'd probably never say that ot my brother in law either because why start a family feud over a goddam cigar?
What makes me sick here is that you KNOW Randy would never say anything and I think you are taking advantage of him.
Here'e the RIGHT way to handle the situation (but of course an arrogant know-it-all like you would never think of this):
You should buy a nice cigar or two and go to Randy and say "Gee, I see that the Ashton VSG Spellbound I put in your pass was damaged. I've got a couple of replacement sticks for you, an Opus X Double Corona and a Padron 1926 #1 maduro. I hope this begins to make up for the ruined cigar I put in your pass."
That would have been the way many of us here would have handled the situation Scotty, but no, you see nothing wrong with your proposed solution which is to put Randy on the spot in an uncomfortable position that you know he has no choice in.
You make me sick to my stomach.
Last edited by CoventryCat86; 05-01-2005 at 10:32 AM.
Corresponding Authority
No one made an issue of it because that's when everyone involved in the pass used to like you and gave you a "pass" on your indiscretions. Don't think for one minute that it didn't go unnoticed.
Since then, you've shown your true colors, that being that you are opportunistic scum and a back stabbing chameleon and because we now have your number, your behavior is looked at with a more discriminating eye these days.
It’s unfortunate that you turned out to be such an arrogant, pompous self-proclaimed know-it-all because I used to hold you in high regard until you showed everyone the real Scotty.
I guess I just feel stupid for thinking so highly of you because you ultimately made a fool out of me.
Corresponding Authority
For you 3rd party observers, Scotty is employing a basic tactic of "debating" one which I will agree he is an expert in, he's a "Master Debater" and a "Master Baiter" no argument from me on that one.
The technique he is using here (which he knows he'd be admonished for on one of his debating forums because it violates the rules) is to bring the argument of the debate "off-topic" by introducing irrelevant information and trying to start debate on another topic before he's finished the first one. He's trying to make it look like my thread topic here should be completely disregarded by all of you because I didn't bring it up in the original pass thread a couple of months ago.
Sorry Scotty, it won't work.
Nice try though.......
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks