Well, when you're right, your right, although I had to read that sentence a few times (the "." key is between the "," and "/" keys on most keyboards.) . I misspoke. No one said don't get involved. But the "advice" I was referring to was given by GG in another thread...
"We have a number of people that are reading a particular post or series of posts and interpreting the entire episode based upon what they just read. It has no context - it has no overall relevance - it is just a snipit a much larger issue. Kinda like watching a small segment of The Notebook, seeing a comedic element and calling the whole movie a comedy.
Some in this community are trying to understand where people are coming from with their thoughts about recent events. To be honest, they should be reading all of the history of this issue and then interjecting their feelings - not asking for the Reader's Digest condensed version. I know it's Kinda tough to do that - it is spread out all over the board in various threads and there is no guide that could possibly navigate someone through all of the mess (Newfie says he's going to try this weekend - maybe when he's all done he can put something together for us - IF he reads ALL of it.)."
So, Joe, I have to say that George has given some outstanding advice here... go back and read the threads from the past 5 or 6 months or more. Get a good picture of what's been going on here with me and others before me. Then when you look at my posts over the last 4 days put them in context with what's been going on in the past. (I have a feeling that more than a few folks in the "community" know exactly what I'm doing.)
Geez, Bill. I've only been raggin' on you for 4 days now. Where's that thick skin? The 14th is only 6 days away.
I guess you can dish it out but you can't take it.
What a weenie!
Bookmarks